IVVW ranks 2nd and XRMI 23rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs XRMI
IVVW −0.35pt a year
0.25%0.60%
IVVW 1.9×the volume
41.5K21.8K
IVVW vs XRMI Performance
+12.9%+7.8%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- XRMI 0.60%
- IVVW $348M
- XRMI $63M
- IVVW +12.9%, better
- XRMI +7.8%
- IVVW 18.63%, better
- XRMI 12.46%
- IVVW 506
- XRMI 506
- IVVW 41.5K sh, better
- XRMI 21.8K sh
- IVVW $44.40
- XRMI $16.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | XRMI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C53 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C53Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A72Higher | C54 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and XRMI are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
XRMIB
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
XRMI A covered-call fund with a seatbelt. XRMI owns the S&P 500, sells at-the-money calls for income, and spends part of that premium on puts 5% below the market, so the hedge is built in rather than bolted on. Pays monthly.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
XRMI XRMI seeks returns broadly corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. It owns S&P 500 stocks and uses a net-credit collar to generate income while mitigating significant market declines.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs XRMI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs XRMI Cost
Overpaying XRMI vs IVVW
$6,658
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
XRMI 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | XRMI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $1,076 | $621 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $4,116 | $2,347 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $11,817 | $6,658 |
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- 0.60%XRMI
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
XRMI 25th cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs XRMI Dividends
- IVVW 18.63%, better
- XRMI 12.46%
- IVVW $8.25
- XRMI $2.12
- IVVW $0.88
- XRMI $0.15
- IVVW Oct 2, 2026
- XRMI Oct 19, 2026
- IVVW Oct 7, 2026
- XRMI Oct 22, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- XRMI Monthly
Distribution history
IVVW vs XRMI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%XRMI 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10XRMI 0.93
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%XRMI −15.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54XRMI 0.35
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.