XHS ranks 4th and IYH 5th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
IYH vs XHS
XHS −0.02pt a year
0.37%0.35%
IYH 24.7×the volume
788K31.9K
IYH +0.7pt
+12.2%+11.5%
IYH vs XHS Performance
+42.8%+36.6%
- IYH 0.37%
- XHS 0.35%, better
- IYH $4.64B
- XHS $234M
- IYH +29.4%
- XHS +39.7%, better
- IYH 1.03%, better
- XHS 0.15%
- IYH 102
- XHS 63
- IYH 788K sh, better
- XHS 31.9K sh
- IYH $77.80
- XHS $144.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IYH | XHS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A76 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | D35 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A85Higher | B64 |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. IYH and XHS are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IYHA
XHSA
In short
IYH Healthcare in one ticker from the class of 2000: roughly 100 drug, biotech and device names drawn from the Russell 1000, with index caps that stop any single giant from running the show.
XHS Most health care ETFs are pharma funds in disguise. XHS buys the delivery system instead: insurers, hospitals, distributors and clinics, roughly equal weighted so one giant insurer does not run the show.
Stated mandate
IYH The fund is designed to follow a healthcare-sector equity index focused on U.S. companies, while providing diversified exposure to pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and healthcare equipment.
XHS The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index before fees and expenses, providing targeted exposure to health care services companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IYH vs XHS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IYH vs XHS Cost
Overpaying IYH vs XHS
$387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IYH 0.37%
$7,513
XHS 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IYH | XHS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $634 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $2,454 | $136 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $7,126 | $387 |
- 0.37%IYH
- 0.35%XHS, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
XHS 5th cheapest of 25 funds
IYH 7th cheapest of 25 funds
IYH vs XHS Dividends
- IYH 1.03%, better
- XHS 0.15%
- IYH $0.80
- XHS $0.21
- IYH $0.19
- XHS $0.01
- IYH Sep 15, 2026
- XHS Sep 21, 2026
- IYH Sep 18, 2026
- XHS Sep 23, 2026
- IYH Quarterly
- XHS Quarterly
Distribution history
IYH vs XHS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IYH
- XHS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IYH 14.4%, betterXHS 20.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IYH 0.78XHS 0.85, better
- Worst fall
- IYH −17.9%, betterXHS −30.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IYH 0.57XHS 0.93
IYH and XHS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
