JAAA ranks 2nd and PCMM 31st of 34 funds in the Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) Category.
JAAA vs PCMM
JAAA −0.48pt a year
0.20%0.68%
JAAA 144.7×the volume
6.54M45.2K
JAAA vs PCMM Performance
+4.9%+5.5%
- JAAA 0.20%, better
- PCMM 0.68%
- JAAA $32.3B
- PCMM $268M
- JAAA +4.9%
- PCMM +5.5%, better
- JAAA 5.26%
- PCMM 6.58%, better
- JAAA 635
- PCMM 99
- JAAA 6.54M sh, better
- PCMM 45.2K sh
- JAAA $50.49
- PCMM $49.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JAAA | PCMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | F0 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A98Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | B62 |
| Durability | A93Higher | B55 |
Rank among Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
Same Category. JAAA and PCMM are both graded against the same 34 Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JAAAA
PCMMD
In short
JAAA The AAA CLO trade in an ETF wrapper, running since 2020: floating-rate exposure to the senior slice of the corporate loan stack, aiming for capital preservation and income, at a fee below the group norm.
Stated mandate
JAAA The fund seeks capital preservation and current income through floating-rate exposure to high-quality AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JAAA vs PCMM Holdings
How JAAA and PCMM differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country45.2%
Sector
No Sector split for JAAA and PCMM.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in JAAAMore in PCMM | JAAA | PCMM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cayman Islands | JAAA +53.5 points | 92.4% | 38.9% |
| United States | PCMM +46.1 points | 4.4% | 50.5% |
| United Kingdom | PCMM +8.7 points | 1.8% | 10.5% |
| Bermuda | JAAA +1.1 points | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | JAAA +0.3 points | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Outside the US: JAAA 2% developed, 98% emerging. PCMM 21% developed, 79% emerging.
Concentration
- JAAA7.2%
- PCMM27.1%
- JAAA631
- PCMM99
Asset class
- JAAA
- Fixed Income
- PCMM
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. JAAA holds 631 securities, PCMM 99.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JAAA vs PCMM Cost
Overpaying PCMM vs JAAA
$9,097
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JAAA 0.20%
$4,155
PCMM 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JAAA | PCMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,215 | $850 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $4,633 | $3,212 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $13,252 | $9,097 |
- 0.20%JAAA, cheaper
- 0.68%PCMM
- Middle half of Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
- Median 0.28%
JAAA 8th cheapest of 34 funds
PCMM 34th cheapest of 34 funds
JAAA vs PCMM Dividends
- JAAA 5.26%
- PCMM 6.58%, better
- JAAA $2.65
- PCMM $3.28
- JAAA $0.21
- PCMM $0.23
- JAAA Oct 30, 2026
- PCMM Nov 2, 2026
- JAAA Pays Nov 5, 2026
- PCMM Pays Nov 5, 2026
- JAAA Monthly
- PCMM Monthly
Distribution history
JAAA vs PCMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JAAA 0.8%PCMM 2.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- JAAA 1.98PCMM 0.79
- Worst fall
- JAAA −2.6%PCMM −4.3%
- Market sensitivity
- JAAA 0.02PCMM 0.09
JAAA and PCMM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


