Skip to content

JANT vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jan ETF

JANTBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

JANT0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 15.6×the volume

JANT8.84KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

JANT +7.3pt

JANT+17.9%ZALT+10.6%

JANT vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+12.1%JANT+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. JANT +12.1%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JANT 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
JANT $56M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
JANT +12.1%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
JANT 2
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
JANT 8.84K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
JANT $45.64
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JANT: Cost 68, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings 46, Durability 56. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for JANT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJANTZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC52A79Higher
Tradability15% weightB68HigherB65
Holdings10% weightC46A90Higher
Durability5% weightB56B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JANT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and JANT 12th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 12BAPRPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 61
  4. Rank 12BJANTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jan ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 14BAPRTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Apr ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JANTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jan ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

JANT A buffer fund that runs on the calendar: the 12-month outcome period opens January 1 and closes December 31, absorbing the first 10% of S&P 500 price losses in exchange for a cap reset each New Year.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

JANT The Fund seeks to match the stated underlying reference's returns at the end of the current Outcome Period up to an upside Cap, while providing a downside buffer against the first 10% of losses before fees and expenses.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • JANT Fee is 0.74%, below the typical shallow-buffer fund, and the overall build stands among the stronger ones in its peer group.
  • The outcome period runs January 1 to December 31, so the reset lands with the calendar year rather than mid-quarter.allianzim.com
  • Exchange-traded FLEX options held inside a 1940 Act fund and cleared by the OCC, so the payoff does not ride on one bank's credit the way a structured note does.allianzim.comsec.gov
  • One of twelve monthly AllianzIM Buffer10 funds, so a January start can be laddered alongside other reset months.allianzim.com
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • JANT The buffer covers the first 10% of losses before fees and expenses; deeper declines pass through, and the upside stops at the period's cap.
  • The reference is the S&P 500 price index, so dividends sit outside the payoff math.
  • Thinly traded, so limit orders earn their keep, and buying mid-period leaves you with a different cap and buffer than the ones set on January 1.allianzim.com
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full JANT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

JANT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JANT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying JANT vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JANT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JANT 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JANT $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearJANTZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JANT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

JANT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

JANT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
JANT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

JANTAll JANT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JANT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JANT 8.1%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JANT 1.55, betterZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JANT −16.2%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JANT 0.68ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • JANTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jan ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JANTBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jan ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JANTBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jan ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.