Skip to content

JPAN vs SCJ

Matthews Japan Active ETF JPAN

JPANCNYSE Arca

iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

SCJANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCJ −0.29pt a year

JPAN0.79%SCJ0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

SCJ 26.6×the volume

JPAN1.45KSCJ38.6K

3Y return · a year

JPAN +3.2pt

JPAN+22.3%SCJ+19.1%

JPAN vs SCJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+15.4%JPAN+18.0%SCJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. JPAN +15.4%. SCJ +18.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%25%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JPAN 0.79%
SCJ 0.50%, better
Fund size
JPAN $11M
SCJ $221M
1Y total return
JPAN +15.4%
SCJ +18.0%, better
Yield (12M)
JPAN 4.45%, better
SCJ 2.79%
Holdings
JPAN 52
SCJ 767
Avg volume (30D)
JPAN 1.45K sh
SCJ 38.6K sh, better
NAV per share
JPAN $38.73
SCJ $100.33
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JPAN: Cost 26, Risk 44, Mission 100, Tradability 7, Holdings 35, Durability 26. SCJ: Cost 56, Risk 75, Mission 97, Tradability 77, Holdings 85, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for JPAN, SCJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJPANSCJ
Cost30% weightD26B56Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA97
Risk15% weightC44A75Higher
Tradability15% weightF7A77Higher
Holdings10% weightD35A85Higher
Durability5% weightD26B64Higher

Rank among Japan funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JPAN and SCJ are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Japan⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

SCJ ranks 3rd and JPAN 14th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLJPFranklin FTSE Japan ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2ABBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3ASCJiShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4AFLJHFranklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 12CJPYLazard Japanese Equity ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 14CJPANMatthews Japan Active ETF JPANScore 45
  7. Rank 15CMJSCMUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JPANCMatthews Japan Active ETF JPAN

SCJAiShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

In short

JPAN The Japan aisle is stacked with cheap index trackers. JPAN is the other thing: an active, stock-picked Japan portfolio from an Asia-only shop, launched in 2023 and priced like the research effort it is.

SCJ Japan past the household-name exporters. SCJ holds roughly 800 of the country's smaller listed companies, the domestic slice that large-cap Japan benchmarks leave out, and it has been running that mandate since 2007.

Stated mandate

JPAN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

SCJ The fund seeks to track an index composed of small-capitalization Japanese equities.

Why people hold it

  • JPAN Actively managed by Matthews, a firm built around Asia, with one stated job: long-term capital appreciation from Japanese equities.
  • The portfolio stays inside the Japan mandate on the label, with no drift into the wider Asia-Pacific region.
  • Standard 1940 Act fund structure: no leverage, no commodity-pool plumbing, no derivative overlay to decode.
  • SCJ One job, done tightly: it tracks the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, roughly 800 names deep, the part of the market big blue-chip Japan benchmarks leave on the floor.ishares.com
  • Trading since 2007, so there is a long live record here, not a backtest, and it has stayed tight to its index over that stretch.
  • About 800 holdings means no single stock carries the portfolio, and the 0.50% fee sits right at the median for single-country Japan funds.

Worth knowing

  • JPAN At 0.79% a year it sits well above the typical Japan ETF, where index rivals like FLJP (0.09%) and BBJP (0.19%) set the floor.
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than the giant index names in the same aisle.
  • Launched in 2023, so the record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than quarterly.
  • SCJ 0.50% a year is the going rate for the niche, but broad Japan trackers like FLJP (0.09%) and BBJP (0.19%) charge a fraction. Small-cap coverage is the upcharge.
  • Moderately traded, and Tokyo is closed while US markets are open, so spreads and price-to-value gaps can widen at the edges of the session.
  • Unhedged: the holdings are priced in yen, so currency swings land on top of the stock moves, in both directions. Distributions come once or twice a year.ishares.com

Full JPAN profile⁠

Full SCJ profile⁠

JPAN vs SCJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JPAN vs SCJ Cost

Overpaying JPAN vs SCJ

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JPAN 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SCJ 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JPAN 0.79%
  • SCJ 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530JPAN $15,174SCJ $9,979

Year by year

YearJPANSCJOverpaying
10$1,405$900$505
20$5,331$3,460$1,871
30$15,174$9,979$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%JPAN
  • 0.50%SCJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Japan funds
  • Median 0.54%

SCJ 9th cheapest of 18 funds

JPAN 13th cheapest of 18 funds

JPAN vs SCJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
JPAN 4.45%, better
SCJ 2.79%
Payout (12M)
JPAN $1.83
SCJ $2.92
Last payment
JPAN $1.83
SCJ $0.92
Ex-dividend
JPAN Dec 17, 2025
SCJ Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
JPAN Dec 22, 2025
SCJ Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
JPAN Annual
SCJ Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

JPANAnnual · 3 paymentsAll JPAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Dec 18, 2024 $0.47; Dec 17, 2025 $1.83. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
SCJTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll SCJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.61; Dec 19, 2017 $0.55; Jun 19, 2018 $0.41; Dec 18, 2018 $0.53; Jun 17, 2019 $1.19; Dec 16, 2019 $2.12; Jun 15, 2020 $0.70; Jun 10, 2021 $0.59; Dec 13, 2021 $0.82; Jun 9, 2022 $0.76; Jun 7, 2023 $0.50; Dec 20, 2023 $0.93; Jun 11, 2024 $0.71; Dec 17, 2024 $0.60; Jun 16, 2025 $0.89; Dec 16, 2025 $2.00; Jun 15, 2026 $0.92. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

JPAN vs SCJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JPAN 14.7%SCJ 13.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JPAN 1.20, betterSCJ 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JPAN −15.2%since Sep 2023SCJ −27.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JPAN 0.86SCJ 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • JPANCvsFLJPA

    Matthews Japan Active ETF JPAN · Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCJAvsFLJPA

    iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPANCvsBBJPA

    Matthews Japan Active ETF JPAN · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCJAvsBBJPA

    iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPANCvsFLJHA

    Matthews Japan Active ETF JPAN · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCJAvsFLJHA

    iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.