JUCY vs LQDM: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF

JUCYBCboe

Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF

LQDMCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

LQDM −0.06pt a year

JUCY0.60%LQDM0.54%

Avg volume · 30D

JUCY 27.2×the volume

JUCY158KLQDM5.81K

JUCY vs LQDM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.0%JUCY−0.3%LQDM

Expense ratio: JUCY 0.60%; LQDM 0.54%, better
Fund size: JUCY $352M; LQDM $4M
1Y total return: JUCY +5.7%; LQDM No data
Yield (12M): JUCY 8.21%; LQDM No data
Holdings: JUCY 13; LQDM 3
Avg volume (30D): JUCY 158K sh, better; LQDM 5.81K sh
NAV per share: JUCY $21.72; LQDM $23.04
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for JUCY, LQDM, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	JUCY	LQDM
Cost30% weight	C54	B69Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B67Higher	D34
Tradability15% weight	B60Higher	C49
Holdings10% weight	A71Higher	C50
Durability5% weight	A71Higher	D26

Rank among Treasury Option Income funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. JUCY and LQDM are both graded against the same 13 Treasury Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Treasury Option Income⁠

Category · 13 funds

See all 13 ›

JUCY ranks 4th and LQDM 8th of 13 funds in the Treasury Option Income Category.

Rank 1ABENJHorizon Landmark ETFScore 76
Rank 2ATLTWiShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETFScore 75
Rank 3ABUCKSimplify Treasury Option Income ETFScore 69
Rank 4BJUCYAptus Enhanced Yield ETFScore 61
Rank 5CTLTINEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETFScore 49
Rank 8CDEFRAptus Deferred Income ETFScore 40
Rank 8CLQDMAmplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETFScore 40
Rank 10DFIAXNicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUCYBAptus Enhanced Yield ETF

LQDMCAmplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF

In short

JUCY Treasuries with a payout target attached. Aptus pairs U.S. government fixed income with an income overlay and, per its own shareholder report, aims to keep monthly distributions in roughly the 5% to 12% range, topping up with return of capital when income runs short.

LQDM No data

Stated mandate

JUCY The retrieved SEC material establishes that JUCY's pre-June 24, 2025 fixed-income and equity-linked-note strategy no longer represents its current objective. The replacement objective is not stated in the available evidence.

LQDM No data

Why people hold it

JUCY The payout policy is written down, not improvised: relatively stable monthly distributions targeted at roughly 5% to 12% a year rather than whatever coupons and premiums happen to land.sec.gov
The foundation is U.S. government fixed income, not corporate credit, and the fund grades itself against the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index with a short-dated Treasury index alongside it.sec.gov
Actively managed by a team that can dial the overlay, and it sits in the upper half of its small group of Treasury-overlay income ETFs. Running since 2022.

LQDM No data

Worth knowing

JUCY At 0.60% the fee is mid-pack: TLTX (0.29%), TLTW and BUCK (0.35%) run their versions of Treasury-plus-options income for less.
Hitting the distribution target can involve return of capital: the fund states it may pay some back when monthly payouts exceed the income it earned. That trims your cost basis.sec.gov
The strategy was reworked in mid-2025, so the record spans two different recipes. The earlier equity-linked-note approach is not what you own today.

LQDM No data

Full JUCY profile⁠

Full LQDM profile⁠

JUCY vs LQDM Holdings

How JUCY and LQDM differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JUCY and 0.0% of LQDM.

Level by level

Asset classFixed Income, Equity0.0%
Holdings0 in both0.0%
Countryby domicile85.9%

Sector

No Sector split for JUCY.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JUCY and LQDM, widest gap first
Country	More in JUCYMore in LQDM	JUCY	LQDM
United States	JUCY +14.1 points	100.0%	85.9%
United Kingdom	LQDM +4.6 points	0.0%	4.6%
Canada	LQDM +2.5 points	0.0%	2.5%
Japan	LQDM +2.0 points	0.0%	2.0%
Australia	LQDM +0.9 points	0.0%	0.9%
Belgium	LQDM +0.7 points	0.0%	0.7%
Spain	LQDM +0.7 points	0.0%	0.7%
Switzerland	LQDM +0.7 points	0.0%	0.7%
Other countries (8)	LQDM +2.1 points	0.0%	2.1%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

JUCY93.3%
LQDM100.1%

Securities held

JUCY13
LQDM2

Asset class

JUCY: Fixed Income
LQDM: Equity

Holdings

Only in JUCY13
In both0
Only in LQDM2

Only in JUCY

13 securities, 100% of JUCY by weight

United States Treasury Note/Bond 1% 07/31/202822.39%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.5% 11/15/202813.11%
United States Treasury Bill 07/08/202711.78%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 4.5% 05/31/202910.38%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.875% 04/15/20297.31%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.5% 10/31/20277.15%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 4% 07/31/20326.58%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/20275.88%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 4.375% 08/31/20314.40%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.25% 11/15/20274.36%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.875% 04/30/20314.31%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.625% 12/31/20301.43%
Cash & Other0.93%

Only in LQDM

2 securities, 99.7% of LQDM by weight

iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF99.74%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/2031<0.01%

Weight gaps

JUCY and LQDM share no securities.

All 9 JUCY holdings⁠All 2 LQDM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUCY vs LQDM Cost

Overpaying JUCY vs LQDM

$1,097

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

JUCY 0.60%
$11,817
LQDM 0.54%
$10,720

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

JUCY 0.60%
LQDM 0.54%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	JUCY	LQDM	Overpaying
10	$1,076	$971	$105
20	$4,116	$3,724	$392
30	$11,817	$10,720	$1,097

Expense ratio

0.60%JUCY
0.54%LQDM, cheaper

LQDM0.54%JUCY0.60%

0.35%1.18%

Middle half of Treasury Option Income funds
Median 0.65%

LQDM 4th cheapest of 13 funds

JUCY 6th cheapest of 13 funds

JUCY vs LQDM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): JUCY 8.21%; LQDM No data
Payout (12M): JUCY $1.78; LQDM No data
Last payment: JUCY $0.15; LQDM $0.23
Ex-dividend: JUCY Oct 29, 2026; LQDM Oct 29, 2026
Paid on: JUCY Oct 30, 2026; LQDM Oct 30, 2026
Frequency: JUCY Monthly; LQDM Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

JUCYMonthly · 46 paymentsAll JUCY payments⁠

LQDMMonthly · 6 paymentsAll LQDM payments⁠

JUCY vs LQDM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: JUCY 1.9%LQDM No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: JUCY 0.04LQDM No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: JUCY −1.6%since Nov 2022LQDM No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: JUCY 0.11LQDM 0.23; Market = 1

JUCY and LQDM in the news

All news⁠

ETF Filings
Aptus files the Aptus Nasdaq-100 Enhanced Yield ETF, JUCQ, targeting distributions of 5% to 12%
Oct 16, 2026JUCY

Popular comparisons

JUCYBvsBENJA
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF · Horizon Landmark ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.40%
Category
LQDMCvsBENJA
Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF · Horizon Landmark ETF
Expense ratio
0.54% · 0.40%
Category
JUCYBvsTLTWA
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF · iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.35%
Category
LQDMCvsTLTWA
Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF · iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
Expense ratio
0.54% · 0.35%
Category
JUCYBvsBUCKA
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF · Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.38%
Category
LQDMCvsBUCKA
Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF · Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
Expense ratio
0.54% · 0.38%
Category

JUCY vs LQDM

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How JUCY and LQDM differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in JUCY

Only in LQDM

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Aptus files the Aptus Nasdaq-100 Enhanced Yield ETF, JUCQ, targeting distributions of 5% to 12%

How JUCY and LQDM differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in JUCY

Only in LQDM

Weight gaps