Skip to content
etf.net

JULC vs ZALT

Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

JULCCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

JULC −0.39pt a year

JULC0.30%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 90.6×the volume

JULC1.53KZALT138K

JULC vs ZALT Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 29, 2026

+2.8%JULC+2.1%ZALT

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 29, 2026. JULC +2.8%. ZALT +2.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JULC 0.30%, better
ZALT 0.69%
Fund size
JULC $2M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
JULC No data
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
JULC 4
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
JULC 1.53K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
JULC $25.52
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JULC: Cost 97, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 8, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for JULC, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJULCZALT
Cost30% weightA97HigherA82
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightB60A79Higher
Tradability15% weightF8B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightF2B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JULC and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and JULC 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 57CFOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 40
  4. Rank 57CJULCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 57CJUNCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JULCCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

JULC No data

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

JULC No data

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

JULC No data

  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

JULC No data

  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full JULC profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

JULC vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JULC vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying ZALT vs JULC

$7,280

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JULC 0.30%

    $6,149

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JULC 0.30%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530ZALT $13,429JULC $6,149

Year by year

YearJULCZALTOverpaying
10$545$1,232$687
20$2,113$4,697$2,584
30$6,149$13,429$7,280

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%JULC, cheaper
  • 0.69%ZALT
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

JULC 2nd cheapest of 77 funds

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

JULC vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
JULC None
ZALT None

Distribution history

JULCAll JULC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULC vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JULC No dataZALT 3.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JULC No dataZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JULC No dataZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JULC 0.00ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • JULCCvsAUGPB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULCCvsTENJB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULCCvsSIXJB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.