USEP ranks 2nd and JULJ 9th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.
JULJ vs USEP
0.0%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
USEP 18.0×the volume
2.6K46.7K
USEP +7.1pt
+6.0%+13.1%
JULJ vs USEP Performance
+4.9%+7.5%
- JULJ 0.79%
- USEP 0.79%
- JULJ $14M
- USEP $243M
- JULJ +4.9%
- USEP +7.5%, better
- JULJ 5.67%, better
- USEP 0.00%
- JULJ 5
- USEP 4
- JULJ 2.6K sh
- USEP 46.7K sh, better
- JULJ $24.88
- USEP $41.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULJ | USEP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C45 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | |
| Durability | F21 | B66Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
Same Category. JULJ and USEP are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULJC
USEPB
In short
JULJ Most defined-outcome funds trade your upside for a cushion and pay you nothing along the way. JULJ flips the deal: a distribution rate set for each outcome period and paid quarterly, with the first 30% of S&P 500 price losses absorbed.
Stated mandate
JULJ The Fund seeks to provide a defined distribution over each Outcome Period while protecting shareholders from the first 30% of losses in the referenced U.S. equity index over that period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULJ vs USEP Holdings
How JULJ and USEP differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.5% of USEP and 0.0% of JULJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector97.8%
Sector
| Sector | More in JULJMore in USEP | JULJ | USEP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | USEP +1.8 points | 38.7% | 40.5% |
| Financials | JULJ +1.0 points | 12.1% | 11.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | JULJ +0.5 points | 9.3% | 8.8% |
| Communication | USEP +0.5 points | 9.5% | 9.9% |
| Industrials | JULJ +0.2 points | 7.8% | 7.5% |
| Consumer Staples | JULJ +0.2 points | 4.5% | 4.3% |
| Materials | JULJ +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Utilities | JULJ +0.1 points | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | JULJ +0.1 points | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Energy | JULJ +0.1 points | 3.5% | 3.4% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.3% | 9.3% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in JULJMore in USEP | JULJ | USEP |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- JULJ120.2%
- USEP102.1%
- JULJ5
- USEP4
Asset class
- JULJ
- Equity
- USEP
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in JULJ4
- In both1
- Only in USEP3
Only in JULJ
4 securities, 100% of JULJ by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 06/10/202799.01%
- Spx 06/30/2027 5174.17 P18.44%
- United States Treasury Bill 12/31/20261.35%
- United States Treasury Bill 03/18/20271.34%
Only in USEP
3 securities, 100% of USEP by weight
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF97.48%
- Voo 08/31/2027 669.65 P4.00%
- Voo 08/31/2027 733.06 C0.10%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in JULJMore in USEP | JULJ | USEP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037 | USEP +0.47 points | 0.03% | 0.50% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULJ vs USEP Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULJ 0.79%
$15,174
USEP 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULJ | USEP |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%JULJ
- 0.79%USEP
- Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
- Median 0.79%
JULJ 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
USEP 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
JULJ vs USEP Dividends
- JULJ 5.67%, better
- USEP 0.00%
- JULJ $1.41
- USEP None
- JULJ $0.34
- USEP
- JULJ Sep 30, 2026
- USEP
- JULJ Oct 2, 2026
- USEP
- JULJ Quarterly
- USEP
Distribution history
JULJ vs USEP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULJ 1.1%, betterUSEP 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULJ 1.36USEP 1.36Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- JULJ −3.6%USEP −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- JULJ 0.05USEP 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.