Skip to content

JULT vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF

JULTBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

JULT0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 10.6×the volume

JULT13.1KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

JULT +6.2pt

JULT+16.8%ZALT+10.6%

JULT vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.6%JULT+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. JULT +9.6%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JULT 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
JULT $58M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
JULT +9.6%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Yield (12M)
JULT 0.00%
ZALT No data
Holdings
JULT 2
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
JULT 13.1K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
JULT $49.13
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JULT: Cost 68, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 55, Durability 60. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for JULT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJULTZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC46A79Higher
Tradability15% weightC48B65Higher
Holdings10% weightB55A90Higher
Durability5% weightB60B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JULT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and JULT 21st of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 21BEALTInnovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 21BJULTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 23BBOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JULTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

JULT A 10% cushion on an S&P 500 tracker, reset every July 1. JULT trades unlimited upside for a defined buffer across each 12-month window, and it has been running that trade since 2020 at a fee below the shallow-buffer norm.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

JULT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price returns at the end of the Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses in that underlying ETF.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • JULT The deal is written down in advance: match the S&P 500 tracker's share-price return to June 30, absorb the first 10% of its losses, and give up upside above a cap.
  • 0.74% a year prices under the median fund in its shallow-buffer group and under 0.79% July rivals such as BJUL.
  • Live since June 2020, so it has already rolled through multiple full July-to-June outcome periods instead of asking you to trust a fresh launch.
  • Measured against dozens of dated shallow-buffer funds on the same reference, it lands among the stronger implementations in the group.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • JULT The cap is what pays for the cushion. Upside is capped, and the new level is struck from option pricing each July 1, so it differs from period to period.
  • Protection stops at 10%: losses beyond that pass through. The reference is share-price return, so tracker dividends are not part of the payoff.
  • Trading is thin next to the largest buffer ETFs, so bid-ask spreads weigh more, and buying mid-period means different terms than the stated cap and buffer.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full JULT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

JULT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JULT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying JULT vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JULT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JULT 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JULT $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearJULTZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JULT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

JULT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

JULT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JULT 0.00%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
JULT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2020, same scale for both

JULT1 paymentAll JULT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2020. Dec 15, 2020 $1.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12020
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JULT 7.9%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JULT 1.46ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JULT −13.6%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JULT 0.62ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • JULTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULTBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULTBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.