ZALT ranks 1st and JULZ 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
JULZ vs ZALT
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 32.4×the volume
4.27K138K
JULZ +6.0pt
+16.0%+10.0%
JULZ vs ZALT Performance
+7.6%+6.9%
- JULZ 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- JULZ $38M
- ZALT $840M
- JULZ +7.6%, better
- ZALT +6.9%
- JULZ 11.07%
- ZALT
- JULZ 9
- ZALT 503
- JULZ 4.27K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- JULZ $45.66
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULZ | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | F24 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A90 | |
| Durability | C52 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. JULZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULZD
ZALTA
In short
JULZ The buffer ETF that skips the ceiling. JULZ buffers the first 8% to 12% of a 12-month drop in the S&P 500 price index with no cap on the upside, the format TrueShares pioneered in 2020.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
JULZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while seeking to buffer the first 8%–12% of index losses over each 12-month period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULZ vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULZ vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying JULZ vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULZ 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULZ | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%JULZ
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
JULZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
JULZ vs ZALT Dividends
- JULZ 11.07%
- ZALT
- JULZ $5.04
- ZALT None
- JULZ $5.04
- ZALT
- JULZ Dec 24, 2025
- ZALT
- JULZ Dec 26, 2025
- ZALT
- JULZ Annual
- ZALT
Distribution history
JULZ vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULZ 10.1%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JULZ 1.15ZALT 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- JULZ −14.7%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- JULZ 0.80ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.