Skip to content

JUNZ vs ZALT

TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF

JUNZDCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

JUNZ0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 56.7×the volume

JUNZ2.39KZALT135K

3Y return · a year

JUNZ +5.1pt

JUNZ+14.7%ZALT+9.6%

JUNZ vs ZALT Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+6.5%JUNZ+6.0%ZALT

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. JUNZ +6.5%. ZALT +6.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JUNZ 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
JUNZ $30M
ZALT $845M
1Y total return
JUNZ +6.5%, better
ZALT +6.0%
Yield (12M)
JUNZ 2.17%
ZALT No data
Holdings
JUNZ 5
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
JUNZ 2.39K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
JUNZ $35.84
ZALT $34.72
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUNZ: Cost 40, Risk 25, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings not scored, Durability 41. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 80, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUNZ, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUNZZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightD25A80Higher
Tradability15% weightF14B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA89
Durability5% weightC41B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUNZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and JUNZ 77th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 76DAPRZTrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETFScore 31
  4. Rank 77DJUNZTrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETFScore 30

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUNZDTrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

JUNZ The June entry in TrueShares' monthly buffer lineup, built on an unusual twist: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price losses over a twelve-month stretch without writing an upside ceiling into its outcome terms.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

JUNZ The Fund seeks pre-expense returns tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index while buffering the first 8%–12% of index losses over a twelve-month period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • JUNZ Most buffer funds sell away your upside to pay for the cushion. This one's stated terms set a downside buffer with no cap figure attached, a rare structure in the S&P 500 buffer aisle.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for S&P 500 buffer funds, and matches what the big-name monthly buffer series charge (PMAY, for one).
  • Running since 2021 as a 1940 Act ETF, with a fresh twelve-month outcome period starting each June. The reset date is fixed and knowable, not a moving target.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • JUNZ The buffer is a range (8% to 12%), not a fixed promise, and it is measured over the full twelve-month period. Buy mid-period and your own cushion and starting point differ from the headline.
  • The reference is the S&P 500 Price Return Index, so index dividends sit outside what the fund targets.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the tool here. Same-index buffer exposure also exists cheaper, such as BUFP at 0.50%.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full JUNZ profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

JUNZ vs ZALT Holdings

How JUNZ and ZALT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors96.8%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

Sector weights in JUNZ and ZALT, widest gap first
SectorMore in JUNZMore in ZALTGap
CommunicationJUNZ +1.5 points
Health CareZALT +1.4 points
EnergyZALT +0.9 points
IndustrialsJUNZ +0.9 points
FinancialsZALT +0.5 points
Consumer StaplesZALT +0.4 points
TechnologyJUNZ +0.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryJUNZ +0.3 points
UtilitiesJUNZ +0.1 points
MaterialsJUNZ +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JUNZ and ZALT, widest gap first
CountryMore in JUNZMore in ZALTGap
United StatesJUNZ +0.5 points
SwitzerlandZALT +0.3 points
ChinaZALT +0.1 points
MexicoZALT +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JUNZ101.8%
  • ZALT37.5%

Securities held

  • JUNZ3
  • ZALT503

Asset class

JUNZ
Stocks
ZALT
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in JUNZ3
  • In both0
  • Only in ZALT503

Only in JUNZ

3 securities, 96.0% of JUNZ by weight

  • Treasury Bill B 05/13/2795.71%
  • Broker Sweep0.16%
  • State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class0.10%

Only in ZALT

503 securities, 100% of ZALT by weight

  • Apple Inc7.65%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.26%
  • Microsoft Corp6.19%

Weight gaps

JUNZ and ZALT share no securities.

All 7 JUNZ holdings⁠All ZALT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUNZ vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying JUNZ vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUNZ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUNZ 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530JUNZ $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearJUNZZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%JUNZ
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

JUNZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

JUNZ vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
JUNZ 2.17%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
JUNZ $0.75
ZALT None
Last payment
JUNZ $0.75
ZALT No data
Ex-dividend
JUNZ Dec 24, 2025
ZALT No data
Paid on
JUNZ Dec 26, 2025
ZALT No data
Frequency
JUNZ Annual
ZALT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

JUNZAnnual · 5 paymentsAll JUNZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2021 $0.09; Dec 29, 2022 $0.13; Dec 27, 2023 $1.58; Dec 27, 2024 $1.18; Dec 24, 2025 $0.75. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUNZ vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUNZ 9.9%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUNZ 1.15ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUNZ −17.9%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUNZ 0.79ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • JUNZDvsSIXJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNZDvsAUGPB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNZDvsBUFMB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsBUFMB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.