Skip to content

KGLD vs YGLD

Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF

KGLDCCboe

Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF

YGLDCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

YGLD −0.45pt a year

KGLD0.99%YGLD0.54%

Avg volume · 30D

KGLD 10.2×the volume

KGLD130KYGLD12.7K

KGLD vs YGLD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.0%KGLD−23.8%YGLD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. KGLD −5.0%. YGLD −23.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KGLD 0.99%
YGLD 0.54%, better
Fund size
KGLD $154M
YGLD $29M
1Y total return
KGLD −5.0%, better
YGLD −23.8%
Yield (12M)
KGLD 18.26%
YGLD 30.27%, better
Holdings
KGLD 7
YGLD 15
Avg volume (30D)
KGLD 130K sh, better
YGLD 12.7K sh
NAV per share
KGLD $23.55
YGLD $26.60
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KGLD: Cost 37, Risk 57, Mission 75, Tradability 65, Holdings 42, Durability 51. YGLD: Cost 96, Risk 24, Mission 20, Tradability 27, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for KGLD, YGLD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKGLDYGLD
Cost30% weightD37A96Higher
Mission25% weightA75HigherF20
Risk15% weightB57HigherF24
Tradability15% weightB65HigherD27
Holdings10% weightC42Not scored
Durability5% weightC51B57Higher

Rank among Gold & Metals Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KGLD and YGLD are both graded against the same 12 Gold & Metals Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Gold & Metals Option Income⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

KGLD ranks 4th and YGLD 5th of 12 funds in the Gold & Metals Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AIAUINEOS Gold High Income ETFScore 72
  2. Rank 2AIGLDFT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BSLJYAmplify SILJ Covered Call ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4CKGLDKurv Gold Enhanced Income ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 5CYGLDSimplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 6CGDXYYieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KGLDCKurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF

YGLDCSimplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF

In short

KGLD Most gold income funds hold metal and sell calls on it. KGLD builds the gold position out of options instead, parks the freed cash in short-dated bonds, then writes calls on top. Active, no index, monthly payouts, 0.99%.

YGLD Most gold-income ETFs sell calls on gold and cap its upside. YGLD flips it: up to roughly 150% gold exposure via futures, with the income coming from option spreads written on other ETFs. 0.62% a year, below the category norm.

Stated mandate

KGLD The Fund seeks to maximize total return through active management of efficient gold exposure while also generating potentially tax-efficient income.

YGLD The Fund seeks income and capital appreciation through an actively managed gold futures strategy and an income-generating options strategy.

Why people hold it

  • KGLD Gold exposure is built from options: buy calls, sell puts at matching strikes and expiries on gold ETPs. The freed collateral sits in short-dated bonds, a second income stream.sec.gov
  • Actively managed against no index. The adviser picks strikes and expiries, and may write uncovered calls when it sees volatility mispriced in the market.sec.gov
  • Bullion itself pays nothing. Here the monthly cash is manufactured from option premiums plus the bond collateral sitting behind the options.sec.gov
  • Sits in the upper half of its gold-income peer group on our review.
  • YGLD The income is not carved out of gold's upside. Rather than selling calls on gold, the fund writes put and call spreads on equity, bond and currency ETFs, and distributes monthly.sec.gov
  • At 0.62% it undercuts every peer at the top of the gold-income group: IAUI at 0.79%, SLJY at 0.76%, IGLD at 0.85%, KGLD at 0.99%. Gross and net are the same figure, with no waiver holding it down.
  • Futures carry the gold exposure, targeting about 150% per dollar at the start of each quarter and resetting quarterly, not daily. No daily compounding reset to track.sec.govsimplify.us

Worth knowing

  • KGLD Written calls limit participation once gold runs past the strike, and uncovered writing beyond the long position carries risks the prospectus spells out.sec.gov
  • 0.99% with no waiver. Near the category median, but above listed peers YGLD (0.62%) and IAUI (0.79%).
  • Launched in 2025, so the record is short. The fund discloses that payouts can include return of capital, which reduces NAV per share.sec.gov
  • YGLD Leverage works in both directions. At roughly 150% exposure a drop in gold lands harder, and since the reset is quarterly, actual exposure drifts above or below that target in between.simplify.us
  • The options sleeve carries its own separate risk: a written spread can lose up to the gap between its two strike prices, on ETFs that have nothing to do with gold.simplify.us
  • Plumbing to know: up to 25% of assets sits in a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary outside 1940 Act protections, and this is one of the smaller, lighter-traded funds in its category.sec.gov

Full KGLD profile⁠

Full YGLD profile⁠

KGLD vs YGLD Holdings

How KGLD and YGLD differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of KGLD and 0.0% of YGLD.

Level by level

  • Asset classCommodities, Alternatives0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for KGLD and YGLD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for KGLD.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • KGLD112.4%
  • YGLD101.9%

Securities held

  • KGLD7
  • YGLD14

Asset class

KGLD
Commodities
YGLD
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in KGLD7
  • In both0
  • Only in YGLD14

Only in KGLD

7 securities, 100% of KGLD by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill 06/10/202738.31%
  • United States Treasury Bill 03/18/202735.48%
  • United States Treasury Bill 12/24/202630.75%

Only in YGLD

14 securities, 100% of YGLD by weight

  • Gold 100 Oz Futr DEC2655.61%
  • Simplify E Govt Money Mkt Etf29.43%
  • B 1/12/27 Govt6.02%

Weight gaps

KGLD and YGLD share no securities.

All KGLD holdings⁠All 41 YGLD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KGLD vs YGLD Cost

Overpaying KGLD vs YGLD

$7,805

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KGLD 0.99%

    $18,525

  • YGLD 0.54%

    $10,720

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KGLD 0.99%
  • YGLD 0.54%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KGLD $18,525YGLD $10,720

Year by year

YearKGLDYGLDOverpaying
10$1,746$971$775
20$6,565$3,724$2,841
30$18,525$10,720$7,805

Expense ratio

  • 0.99%KGLD
  • 0.54%YGLD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Gold & Metals Option Income funds
  • Median 0.95%

YGLD cheapest of 12 funds

KGLD 7th cheapest of 12 funds

KGLD vs YGLD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KGLD 18.26%
YGLD 30.27%, better
Payout (12M)
KGLD $4.30
YGLD $8.06
Last payment
KGLD $0.35
YGLD $0.35
Ex-dividend
KGLD Oct 7, 2026
YGLD Oct 27, 2026
Paid on
KGLD Oct 8, 2026
YGLD Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
KGLD Monthly
YGLD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

KGLDMonthly · 15 paymentsAll KGLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Aug 6, 2025 $0.25; Sep 3, 2025 $0.25; Oct 8, 2025 $0.30; Nov 5, 2025 $0.30; Dec 3, 2025 $0.30; Jan 7, 2026 $0.30; Feb 4, 2026 $0.30; Mar 4, 2026 $0.45; Apr 8, 2026 $0.45; May 6, 2026 $0.40; Jun 3, 2026 $0.40; Jul 8, 2026 $0.35; Aug 5, 2026 $0.35; Sep 2, 2026 $0.35; Oct 7, 2026 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502026YTD
YGLDMonthly · 15 paymentsAll YGLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2025 $0.15; Jun 25, 2025 $0.50; Sep 25, 2025 $1.00; Nov 21, 2025 $2.00; Dec 23, 2025 $2.25; Jan 27, 2026 $0.50; Feb 24, 2026 $0.50; Mar 26, 2026 $0.40; Apr 27, 2026 $0.40; May 26, 2026 $0.40; Jun 25, 2026 $0.28; Jul 28, 2026 $0.28; Aug 26, 2026 $0.35; Sep 25, 2026 $0.35; Oct 27, 2026 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502026YTD

KGLD vs YGLD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KGLD 28.8%since Aug 2025YGLD 38.7%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KGLD 0.36since Aug 2025YGLD 0.58since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KGLD −31.7%since Jul 2025YGLD −49.0%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KGLD 0.42YGLD 0.37

KGLD and YGLD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • KGLDCvsIAUIA

    Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF · NEOS Gold High Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YGLDCvsIAUIA

    Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF · NEOS Gold High Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KGLDCvsIGLDA

    Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF · FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YGLDCvsIGLDA

    Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF · FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KGLDCvsSLJYB

    Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF · Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YGLDCvsSLJYB

    Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF · Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.