SLJY ranks 3rd and KSLV 8th of 12 funds in the Gold & Metals Option Income Category.
KSLV vs SLJY
SLJY −0.23pt a year
0.99%0.76%
KSLV 2.5×the volume
91.9K36.6K
KSLV vs SLJY Performance
−5.0%+4.7%
- KSLV 0.99%
- SLJY 0.76%, better
- KSLV $100M
- SLJY $63M
- KSLV −5.0%
- SLJY +4.7%, better
- KSLV 41.38%, better
- SLJY 31.04%
- KSLV 10
- SLJY 54
- KSLV 91.9K sh, better
- SLJY 36.6K sh
- KSLV $18.59
- SLJY $22.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KSLV | SLJY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | D30 | C45Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | D29 | A79Higher |
| Durability | C52Higher | C51 |
Rank among Gold & Metals Option Income funds
Same Category. KSLV and SLJY are both graded against the same 12 Gold & Metals Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KSLVC
SLJYB
In short
KSLV Nearly every fund in the precious-metals income aisle is built on gold. KSLV takes the silver side, pairing options income with silver-price exposure and paying monthly. Fee: 0.99%, no waiver, right around the category norm.
SLJY Junior silver miners swing hard. SLJY sells that volatility: an out-of-the-money covered-call overlay on a junior silver miner basket, targeting 18% annualized option premium and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
KSLV The Fund seeks to maximize total return by actively managing a portfolio with efficient exposure to silver while generating potentially tax-efficient income.
SLJY The fund seeks to balance high income and capital appreciation through exposure to junior silver mining companies and a covered-call strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KSLV vs SLJY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KSLV vs SLJY Cost
Overpaying KSLV vs SLJY
$3,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KSLV 0.99%
$18,525
SLJY 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KSLV | SLJY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,353 | $393 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $5,142 | $1,423 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $14,656 | $3,869 |
- 0.99%KSLV
- 0.76%SLJY, cheaper
- Middle half of Gold & Metals Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
SLJY 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
KSLV 7th cheapest of 12 funds
KSLV vs SLJY Dividends
- KSLV 41.38%, better
- SLJY 31.04%
- KSLV $7.70
- SLJY $7.16
- KSLV $0.50
- SLJY $0.46
- KSLV Oct 21, 2026
- SLJY Oct 29, 2026
- KSLV Oct 22, 2026
- SLJY Oct 30, 2026
- KSLV Monthly
- SLJY Monthly
Distribution history
KSLV vs SLJY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KSLV 55.8%SLJY 48.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- KSLV 0.16SLJY 0.32
- Worst fall
- KSLV −61.1%SLJY −37.9%
- Market sensitivity
- KSLV 0.66SLJY 0.71
KSLV and SLJY in the news
First-Year Review
Kurv's silver fund paid $7.70 in year one and still lagged the metal

Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.