OKTG ranks 3rd and LASC 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
LASC vs OKTG
0.0%by weight
LASC −0.30pt a year
0.45%0.75%
OKTG 3.9×the volume
9.81K37.8K
LASC vs OKTG Performance
−53.5%+16.9%
- LASC 0.45%, better
- OKTG 0.75%
- LASC $1M
- OKTG $5M
- LASC 3
- OKTG 6
- LASC 9.81K sh
- OKTG 37.8K sh, better
- LASC $5.34
- OKTG $34.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LASC | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | D35 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D26 | C50Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. LASC and OKTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LASCC
OKTGA
In short
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LASC vs OKTG Holdings
How LASC and OKTG differ
0.0%
About this figure: LASC gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
OKTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for LASC and OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in LASCMore in OKTG | Gap | LASC | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- LASC198.6%
- OKTG208.0%
- LASC0
- OKTG1
Asset class
- LASC
- Stocks
- OKTG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in LASC0
- In both0
- Only in OKTG1
Only in LASC
0 securities, 0.0% of LASC by weight
Only in OKTG
1 security, 8.0% of OKTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.03%
Weight gaps
LASC and OKTG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LASC vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying OKTG vs LASC
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LASC 0.45%
$9,041
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LASC | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,336 | $524 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,078 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,482 | $5,441 |
- 0.45%LASC, cheaper
- 0.75%OKTG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
LASC 7th cheapest of 312 funds
OKTG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
LASC vs OKTG Dividends
- LASC None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
LASC vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- LASC 0.00OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.