XHLF ranks 4th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
LBOX vs XHLF
0.0%by weight
XHLF −0.10pt a year
0.13%0.03%
XHLF 79.8×the volume
3.87K309K
LBOX vs XHLF Performance
+0.4%+0.4%
- LBOX 0.13%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- LBOX $3M
- XHLF $2.03B
- LBOX
- XHLF +3.6%
- LBOX
- XHLF 3.75%
- LBOX 3
- XHLF 29
- LBOX 3.87K sh
- XHLF 309K sh, better
- LBOX $25.19
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
- —LBOXNot yet graded
| Pillar | LBOX | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99 | |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C47 | |
| Tradability | A79 | |
| Holdings | D35 | |
| Durability | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Our read on each fund
LBOX—
XHLFA
In short
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LBOX vs XHLF Holdings
How LBOX and XHLF differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of LBOX and 0.0% of XHLF.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for XHLF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in LBOXMore in XHLF | LBOX | XHLF |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | XHLF +0.5 points | 99.5% | 100.0% |
| Switzerland | LBOX +0.3 points | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| China | LBOX +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Mexico | LBOX +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- LBOX100.0%
- XHLF79.1%
- LBOX2
- XHLF29
Asset class
- LBOX
- Equity
- XHLF
- Fixed Income
Holdings
- Only in LBOX2
- In both0
- Only in XHLF29
Only in LBOX
2 securities, 99.0% of LBOX by weight
- 2SPY 11/20/2026 C500.0053.73%
- 2SPY 11/20/2026 P1000.0045.24%
Only in XHLF
29 securities, 100% of XHLF by weight
- Us T Bill Zcp 05/13/279.27%
- Us T Bill Zcp 03/18/279.13%
- Us T Bill Zcp 07/08/279.11%
- Us T Bill Zcp 08/05/278.90%
- Us T Bill Zcp 06/10/278.85%
- Us T Bill Zcp 04/15/277.94%
- Us T Bill Zcp 09/02/277.19%
- Us T Bill Zcp 01/21/276.53%
- Us T Bill Zcp 12/24/266.26%
- Us T Bill Zcp 02/18/275.91%
- Us T Bill Zcp 10/28/274.73%
- Cashusd4.27%
- Us T Bill Zcp 09/30/273.85%
- Us T Bill Zcp 11/27/261.84%
- Us T Bill Zcp 11/12/261.63%
- Us T Bill Zcp 12/17/261.08%
- Us T Bill Zcp 11/05/261.02%
- Us T Bill Zcp 11/19/260.99%
- Us T Bill Zcp 12/03/260.98%
- Us T Bill Zcp 12/10/260.76%
- Us T Bill Zcp 12/31/260.73%
- Us T Bill Zcp 12/08/260.59%
- Us T Bill Zcp 12/15/260.52%
- Us T Bill Zcp 01/28/270.49%
- Us T Bill Zcp 11/10/260.37%
- Us T Bill Zcp 12/22/260.34%
- Us T Bill Zcp 11/17/260.24%
- Us T Bill Zcp 01/05/270.20%
- Us T Bill Zcp 01/07/270.20%
Weight gaps
LBOX and XHLF share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LBOX vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying LBOX vs XHLF
$2,189
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LBOX 0.1349%
$2,827
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LBOX | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $247 | $55 | $192 |
| 20 | $964 | $216 | $748 |
| 30 | $2,827 | $638 | $2,189 |
- 0.13%LBOX
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
LBOX 17th cheapest of 78 funds
LBOX vs XHLF Dividends
- LBOX
- XHLF 3.75%
- LBOX None
- XHLF $1.89
- LBOX
- XHLF $0.15
- LBOX
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- LBOX
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- LBOX
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
LBOX vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LBOX XHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- LBOX XHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- LBOX XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- LBOX 0.00XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.13% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.