Skip to content

LCOW vs SPHQ

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

LCOWCCboe

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF

SPHQANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SPHQ −0.34pt a year

LCOW0.49%SPHQ0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

SPHQ 331.3×the volume

LCOW4.08KSPHQ1.35M

LCOW vs SPHQ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.8%LCOW+13.2%SPHQ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LCOW +14.8%. SPHQ +13.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LCOW 0.49%
SPHQ 0.15%, better
Fund size
LCOW $28M
SPHQ $18.5B
1Y total return
LCOW +14.8%, better
SPHQ +13.2%
Yield (12M)
LCOW 0.64%
SPHQ 1.05%, better
Holdings
LCOW 102
SPHQ 102
Avg volume (30D)
LCOW 4.08K sh
SPHQ 1.35M sh, better
NAV per share
LCOW $26.91
SPHQ $82.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LCOW: Cost 26, Risk 61, Mission 94, Tradability 43, Holdings 31, Durability 28. SPHQ: Cost 84, Risk 62, Mission 69, Tradability 95, Holdings 38, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for LCOW, SPHQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLCOWSPHQ
Cost30% weightD26A84Higher
Mission25% weightA94HigherB69
Risk15% weightB61B62Higher
Tradability15% weightC43A95Higher
Holdings10% weightD31D38Higher
Durability5% weightD28A91Higher

Rank among US Quality Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LCOW and SPHQ are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Quality Index⁠

Category · 26 funds
See all 26 ›

SPHQ ranks 4th and LCOW 16th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AJQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 1AQUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3AFQALFidelity Quality Factor ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4ASPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 5AVFQYVanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETFScore 70
  6. Rank 15BVUSEVident U.S. Equity Strategy ETFScore 54
  7. Rank 16CLCOWPacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETFScore 51
  8. Rank 17CQOWZInvesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LCOWCPacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

SPHQAInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF

In short

LCOW No data

SPHQ Live since 2005, SPHQ is an elder statesman of quality investing: rank the S&P 500 on profitability, earnings quality and balance-sheet strength, hold the top 100, charge 0.15% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.

Stated mandate

LCOW No data

SPHQ The fund seeks exposure to the S&P 500 Quality Index and normally invests at least 90% of assets in common stocks included in that index.

Why people hold it

LCOW No data

  • SPHQ 0.15% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028 (0.20% gross), below the median for quality factor funds and level with QUAL and FQAL at 0.15%.
  • The rules are published and mechanical: score the S&P 500 on return on equity, accruals ratio and financial leverage ratio, take the top 100, weight by quality score times market cap.spglobal.com
  • Universe discipline: candidates come only from the S&P 500, so every holding is an established large cap rather than a smaller name screened in from a broader pool.spglobal.com
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, pays quarterly, and has run since 2005. It sits in the stronger tier of quality factor ETFs.

Worth knowing

LCOW No data

  • SPHQ About 100 stocks, weighted by quality score times market cap, so the biggest high-scorers carry real weight. Narrower than owning the full S&P 500.spglobal.com
  • The index rebalances semiannually, so a company whose fundamentals slip mid-period stays in the portfolio until the next reshuffle.spglobal.com
  • Two peers undercut it on fee: JQUA at 0.12% and VFQY at 0.13%.

Full LCOW profile⁠

Full SPHQ profile⁠

LCOW vs SPHQ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LCOW vs SPHQ Cost

Overpaying LCOW vs SPHQ

$6,655

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LCOW 0.49%

    $9,792

  • SPHQ 0.15%

    $3,137

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LCOW 0.49%
  • SPHQ 0.15%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530LCOW $9,792SPHQ $3,137

Year by year

YearLCOWSPHQOverpaying
10$883$274$609
20$3,394$1,071$2,323
30$9,792$3,137$6,655

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%LCOW
  • 0.15%SPHQ, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Quality Index funds
  • Median 0.39%

SPHQ 3rd cheapest of 26 funds

LCOW 17th cheapest of 26 funds

LCOW vs SPHQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LCOW 0.64%
SPHQ 1.05%, better
Payout (12M)
LCOW $0.17
SPHQ $0.87
Last payment
LCOW $0.04
SPHQ $0.15
Ex-dividend
LCOW Sep 3, 2026
SPHQ Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
LCOW Sep 8, 2026
SPHQ Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
LCOW Quarterly
SPHQ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LCOWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll LCOW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 5, 2025 $0.0049; Sep 4, 2025 $0.03; Dec 30, 2025 $0.07; Mar 5, 2026 $0.02; Jun 4, 2026 $0.04; Sep 3, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
SPHQQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SPHQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.02; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 18, 2017 $0.19; Dec 18, 2017 $0.16; Mar 19, 2018 $0.10; Jun 18, 2018 $0.11; Sep 24, 2018 $0.16; Dec 24, 2018 $0.14; Mar 18, 2019 $0.08; Jun 24, 2019 $0.14; Sep 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 23, 2019 $0.17; Mar 23, 2020 $0.17; Jun 22, 2020 $0.16; Sep 21, 2020 $0.14; Dec 21, 2020 $0.18; Mar 22, 2021 $0.14; Jun 21, 2021 $0.14; Sep 20, 2021 $0.17; Dec 20, 2021 $0.17; Mar 21, 2022 $0.17; Jun 21, 2022 $0.20; Sep 19, 2022 $0.21; Dec 19, 2022 $0.23; Mar 20, 2023 $0.20; Jun 20, 2023 $0.19; Sep 18, 2023 $0.18; Dec 18, 2023 $0.20; Mar 18, 2024 $0.21; Jun 24, 2024 $0.18; Sep 23, 2024 $0.19; Dec 23, 2024 $0.19; Mar 24, 2025 $0.20; Jun 23, 2025 $0.17; Sep 22, 2025 $0.22; Dec 22, 2025 $0.23; Mar 23, 2026 $0.28; Jun 22, 2026 $0.20; Sep 21, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

LCOW vs SPHQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LCOW 10.5%since Jun 2025SPHQ 12.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LCOW 1.43since Jun 2025SPHQ 1.23
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LCOW −10.3%since May 2025SPHQ −25.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LCOW 0.88SPHQ 0.81

LCOW and SPHQ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LCOWCvsJQUAA

    Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPHQAvsJQUAA

    Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCOWCvsQUALA

    Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF · iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPHQAvsQUALA

    Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCOWCvsFQALA

    Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF · Fidelity Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPHQAvsFQALA

    Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · Fidelity Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.