SKOR ranks 4th and LQDH 30th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
LQDH vs SKOR
SKOR −0.09pt a year
0.24%0.15%
SKOR 3.3×the volume
46.1K150K
LQDH +1.7pt
+4.5%+2.8%
LQDH vs SKOR Performance
+29.0%+8.8%
- LQDH 0.24%
- SKOR 0.15%, better
- LQDH $573M
- SKOR $1.07B
- LQDH +5.1%, better
- SKOR +1.1%
- LQDH 5.83%, better
- SKOR 4.77%
- LQDH 3425
- SKOR 1344
- LQDH 46.1K sh
- SKOR 150K sh, better
- LQDH $91.74
- SKOR $47.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LQDH | SKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A78Higher |
| Mission | F20 | A93Higher |
| Risk | A84Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | A75 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | A76 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. LQDH and SKOR are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LQDHC
SKORA
In short
LQDH Corporate credit with the rate risk engineered out: LQDH tracks an index that pairs investment grade corporate bonds with interest rate swaps to mitigate duration. Fee is 0.24% net of a waiver through February 28, 2027.
SKOR Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the market. SKOR scores every eligible bond on issuer quality and relative value, then weights toward the winners, and stays in the one-to-under-10-year maturity lane.
Stated mandate
LQDH The fund seeks to track an index designed to reduce the interest-rate risk of a corporate-bond portfolio.
SKOR The Fund seeks to provide pre-fee investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust US Corporate Bond Quality Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LQDH vs SKOR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LQDH vs SKOR Cost
Overpaying LQDH vs SKOR
$1,822
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LQDH 0.24%
$4,959
SKOR 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LQDH | SKOR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $437 | $274 | $163 |
| 20 | $1,699 | $1,071 | $628 |
| 30 | $4,959 | $3,137 | $1,822 |
- 0.24%LQDH
- 0.15%SKOR, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SKOR 10th cheapest of 49 funds
LQDH 23rd cheapest of 49 funds
LQDH vs SKOR Dividends
- LQDH 5.83%, better
- SKOR 4.77%
- LQDH $5.36
- SKOR $2.26
- LQDH $0.46
- SKOR $0.20
- LQDH Nov 3, 2026
- SKOR Nov 2, 2026
- LQDH Nov 6, 2026
- SKOR Nov 6, 2026
- LQDH Monthly
- SKOR Monthly
Distribution history
LQDH vs SKOR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LQDH
- SKOR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LQDH 2.8%, betterSKOR 4.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- LQDH 0.89, betterSKOR 0.44
- Worst fall
- LQDH −6.8%, betterSKOR −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- LQDH 0.14SKOR 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.24% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.