WTV ranks 1st and LSVD 25th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
LSVD vs WTV
WTV −0.28pt a year
0.40%0.12%
WTV 141.2×the volume
1.19K167K
LSVD vs WTV Performance
+22.9%+20.9%
- LSVD 0.40%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- LSVD $667M
- WTV $3.33B
- LSVD +22.9%, better
- WTV +20.9%
- LSVD
- WTV 2.00%
- LSVD 135
- WTV 126
- LSVD 1.19K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- LSVD $35.98
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LSVD | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | C51 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. LSVD and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LSVDB
WTVA
In short
LSVD An institutional quant value shop's process in an ETF wrapper: a model built on fundamental value measures picks the stocks, the fee sits under the active-value norm, and the yardstick is the S&P 500 rather than a value index.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
LSVD The Fund seeks long-term capital growth. It is an actively managed ETF that invests at least 80% of net assets in equity securities and uses a quantitative model based on fundamental value measures.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LSVD vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LSVD vs WTV Cost
Overpaying LSVD vs WTV
$5,570
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LSVD 0.40%
$8,090
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LSVD | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $220 | $503 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $859 | $1,934 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $2,520 | $5,570 |
- 0.40%LSVD
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
LSVD 19th cheapest of 64 funds
LSVD vs WTV Dividends
- LSVD
- WTV 2.00%
- LSVD
- WTV $2.14
- LSVD $0.10
- WTV $0.55
- LSVD Dec 30, 2025
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- LSVD Jan 7, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- LSVD Irregular
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
LSVD vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LSVD 12.6%WTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- LSVD 2.10WTV 1.33
- Worst fall
- LSVD −8.1%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- LSVD 1.05WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.