Skip to content

LTCC vs XRPZ

Canary Litecoin ETF

LTCCDNasdaq

Franklin XRP ETF

XRPZANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XRPZ −0.76pt a year

LTCC0.95%XRPZ0.19%

Avg volume · 30D

XRPZ 15.3×the volume

LTCC34.4KXRPZ527K

LTCC vs XRPZ Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

−33.3%LTCC−40.5%XRPZ

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. LTCC −33.3%. XRPZ −40.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LTCC 0.95%
XRPZ 0.19%, better
Fund size
LTCC $12M
XRPZ $365M
1Y total return
LTCC −49.6%
XRPZ No data
Holdings
LTCC 2
XRPZ 1
Avg volume (30D)
LTCC 34.4K sh
XRPZ 527K sh, better
NAV per share
LTCC $12.81
XRPZ $12.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LTCC: Cost 10, Risk 33, Mission 75, Tradability 40, Holdings not scored, Durability 46. XRPZ: Cost 100, Risk 46, Mission 99, Tradability 83, Holdings not scored, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for LTCC, XRPZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLTCCXRPZ
Cost30% weightF10A100Higher
Mission25% weightA75A99Higher
Risk15% weightD33C46Higher
Tradability15% weightC40A83Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC46A82Higher

Rank among Crypto Spot funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LTCC and XRPZ are both graded against the same 25 Crypto Spot funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Crypto Spot⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

XRPZ ranks 1st and LTCC 21st of 25 funds in the Crypto Spot Category.

  1. Rank 1AXRPZFranklin XRP ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AHYPGGrayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 20CTDOG21Shares Dogecoin ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 21DLTCCCanary Litecoin ETFScore 39
  5. Rank 22DHBRCanary HBAR ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LTCCDCanary Litecoin ETF

XRPZAFranklin XRP ETF

In short

LTCC A single-coin wrapper for Litecoin: the trust holds the actual coin, values shares off a CoinDesk Litecoin benchmark, and delivers the ride through a brokerage account. Convenience is the product, and it is priced that way.

XRPZ No data

Stated mandate

LTCC Passive vehicle intended to provide exposure to Litecoin held by the Trust, less operating expenses and other liabilities; it values the shares using a CoinDesk Litecoin pricing benchmark.

XRPZ No data

Why people hold it

  • LTCC Holds Litecoin itself, not futures or swaps. You get LTC exposure without wallets, keys, or a crypto exchange account.
  • Plain passive plumbing: a grantor trust that tracks the coin it holds, less expenses, using a CoinDesk Litecoin pricing benchmark. No active calls, no leverage.
  • Litecoin gets a dedicated fund rather than a sliver of a basket, so the exposure is undiluted by other tokens.

XRPZ No data

Worth knowing

  • LTCC The fee is the headline trade-off: 0.95% a year, against roughly 0.30% to 0.34% at cheaper single-asset crypto funds like TSUI, TDOT, XRP and CLNK.
  • A commodity-style trust pays no income. Everything you get comes from Litecoin's price, minus expenses, and crypto price swings are severe.
  • Launched in October 2025 and still small, with light trading. Thin volume tends to mean wider spreads than the giant bitcoin and ether funds.

XRPZ No data

Full LTCC profile⁠

Full XRPZ profile⁠

LTCC vs XRPZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LTCC vs XRPZ Cost

Overpaying LTCC vs XRPZ

$13,917

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LTCC 0.95%

    $17,869

  • XRPZ 0.19%

    $3,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LTCC 0.95%
  • XRPZ 0.19%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LTCC $17,869XRPZ $3,952

Year by year

YearLTCCXRPZOverpaying
10$1,678$347$1,331
20$6,322$1,351$4,971
30$17,869$3,952$13,917

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%LTCC
  • 0.19%XRPZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Crypto Spot funds
  • Median 0.35%

XRPZ cheapest of 25 funds

LTCC 22nd cheapest of 25 funds

LTCC vs XRPZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
LTCC None
XRPZ None

Distribution history

LTCCAll LTCC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XRPZAll XRPZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LTCC vs XRPZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LTCC 54.1%since Nov 2025XRPZ No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LTCC −0.85since Nov 2025XRPZ No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LTCC −62.9%since Oct 2025XRPZ No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LTCC 0.67XRPZ 1.09

LTCC and XRPZ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LTCCDvsHYPGA

    Canary Litecoin ETF · Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XRPZAvsHYPGA

    Franklin XRP ETF · Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LTCCDvsTHYPA

    Canary Litecoin ETF · 21Shares Hyperliquid ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XRPZAvsTHYPA

    Franklin XRP ETF · 21Shares Hyperliquid ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LTCCDvsTOXRA

    Canary Litecoin ETF · 21shares XRP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XRPZAvsTOXRA

    Franklin XRP ETF · 21shares XRP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.