ZALT ranks 1st and MART 27th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
MART vs ZALT
ZALT −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.69%
ZALT 144.5×the volume
956138K
MART +7.0pt
+17.6%+10.6%
MART vs ZALT Performance
+12.8%+7.1%
- MART 0.74%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- MART $29M
- ZALT $840M
- MART +12.8%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- MART 2
- ZALT 503
- MART 956 sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- MART $43.37
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MART | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | A71 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A90Higher |
| Durability | D27 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. MART and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MARTC
ZALTA
In short
MART A March-reset buffer fund: it absorbs the first 10% of a year's drop in an S&P 500 ETF and caps the upside for that stretch in exchange. Standard recipe for the category, priced a shade under the typical rival.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
MART The Fund seeks to provide downside-loss protection covering the first 10% of losses on its Underlying ETF, before fees and expenses.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MART vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MART vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying MART vs ZALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MART 0.74%
$14,307
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MART | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,232 | $87 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $4,697 | $318 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $13,429 | $878 |
- 0.74%MART
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
MART 17th cheapest of 77 funds
MART vs ZALT Dividends
- MART None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
MART vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MART 7.5%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MART 1.61, betterZALT 1.50
- Worst fall
- MART −11.6%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- MART 0.60ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.