Skip to content
etf.net

MIGO vs TACU

MIG Core ETF

MIGOBNYSE Arca

T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF

TACUANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TACU −0.45pt a year

MIGO0.45%TACU0.00%

Avg volume · 30D

MIGO 3.2×the volume

MIGO13.3KTACU4.15K

MIGO vs TACU Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−2.2%MIGO+1.2%TACU

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. MIGO −2.2%. TACU +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MIGO 0.45%
TACU 0.00%, better
Fund size
MIGO $760M
TACU $17M
Holdings
MIGO 50
TACU 411
Avg volume (30D)
MIGO 13.3K sh, better
TACU 4.15K sh
NAV per share
MIGO $29.33
TACU $27.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MIGO: Cost 71, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 46, Durability 60. TACU: Cost 99, Risk 69, Mission 81, Tradability 49, Holdings 83, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for MIGO, TACU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMIGOTACU
Cost30% weightA71A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightD37B69Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherC49
Holdings10% weightC46A83Higher
Durability5% weightB60HigherC43

Rank among US Active Equity funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MIGO and TACU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

TACU ranks 9th and MIGO 44th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 8AAPUEActivePassive U.S. Equity ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 9ATACUT. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 10APQUSPictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 44BJHDGJohn Hancock Hedged Equity ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 44BMIGOMIG Core ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 44BXCHGAb US Equity ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MIGOBMIG Core ETF

TACUAT. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF

In short

MIGO No data

TACU T. Rowe Price's quant-plus-fundamental take on core large-cap U.S. stock, benchmarked to the Russell 1000. Gross fee 0.14%, fully waived to zero through January 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

MIGO No data

TACU The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a primarily U.S. equity portfolio. It combines quantitative models with fundamental, bottom-up analysis and seeks excess returns relative to the Russell 1000 Index.

Why people hold it

MIGO No data

  • TACU Fee fully waived: 0.14% gross, zero net through January 30, 2027. That sits below every top-scoring peer in the category, including DFAU at 0.12% with no waiver.troweprice.com
  • Quant models feed bottom-up stock picking with tilts to profitability, quality and value, chasing excess return over the Russell 1000 while holding tracking error tight.troweprice.com
  • Several hundred large-cap names, so no single position runs the show. One of the stronger profiles in a crowded active U.S. equity field.troweprice.com

Worth knowing

MIGO No data

  • TACU Launched in December 2025, so the live record is short and the risk read rests on limited history.
  • Still a small fund that trades lightly, which can mean wider spreads than the category's giants.
  • Distributions are annual at most, with no declared income target. This is a growth mandate, not a cash-flow one.

Full MIGO profile⁠

Full TACU profile⁠

MIGO vs TACU Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MIGO vs TACU Cost

Overpaying MIGO vs TACU

$9,041

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MIGO 0.45%

    $9,041

  • TACU 0.00%

    $0

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MIGO 0.45%
  • TACU 0.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530MIGO $9,041TACU $0

Year by year

YearMIGOTACUOverpaying
10$812$0$812
20$3,128$0$3,128
30$9,041$0$9,041

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%MIGO
  • 0.00%TACU, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

TACU cheapest of 121 funds

MIGO 34th cheapest of 121 funds

MIGO vs TACU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
MIGO None
TACU None

Distribution history

MIGOAll MIGO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TACUAll TACU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MIGO vs TACU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MIGO 1.68TACU 0.96

Popular comparisons

  • MIGOBvsAVLCA

    MIG Core ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TACUAvsAVLCA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MIGOBvsDFAUA

    MIG Core ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TACUAvsDFAUA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MIGOBvsDFACA

    MIG Core ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TACUAvsDFACA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.