XHLF ranks 4th and MINT 36th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
MINT vs XHLF
XHLF −0.33pt a year
0.36%0.03%
MINT 6.1×the volume
1.89M309K
MINT +0.6pt
+5.0%+4.4%
MINT vs XHLF Performance
+4.2%+3.6%
- MINT 0.36%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- MINT $18.3B
- XHLF $2.03B
- MINT +4.2%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- MINT 4.08%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- MINT 1076
- XHLF 29
- MINT 1.89M sh, better
- XHLF 309K sh
- MINT $100.70
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MINT | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A79 |
| Holdings | A91Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A88Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. MINT and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MINTB
XHLFA
In short
MINT PIMCO's parking spot for cash, running since 2009: an active ultra-short bond portfolio of roughly 800 positions built around current income, capital preservation and daily liquidity, paying out monthly.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
MINT The Fund seeks maximum current income while emphasizing capital preservation and daily liquidity and applying PIMCO’s ESG investment strategy.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MINT vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MINT vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying MINT vs XHLF
$6,682
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MINT 0.36%
$7,320
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MINT | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $55 | $597 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $216 | $2,306 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $638 | $6,682 |
- 0.36%MINT
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
MINT 74th cheapest of 78 funds
MINT vs XHLF Dividends
- MINT 4.08%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- MINT $4.11
- XHLF $1.89
- MINT $0.33
- XHLF $0.15
- MINT Oct 1, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- MINT Oct 5, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- MINT Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
MINT vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MINT 0.4%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MINT 1.69, betterXHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- MINT −2.3%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MINT 0.02XHLF 0.03
MINT and XHLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
