Skip to content
etf.net

MMAX vs ZJUN

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

MMAXACboe

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June

ZJUNCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

MMAX −0.26pt a year

MMAX0.53%ZJUN0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

ZJUN 9.4×the volume

MMAX4.12KZJUN38.7K

MMAX vs ZJUN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.5%MMAX+4.3%ZJUN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MMAX +6.5%. ZJUN +4.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%3%Oct 2025May 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MMAX 0.53%, better
ZJUN 0.79%
Fund size
MMAX $74M
ZJUN $154M
1Y total return
MMAX +6.5%, better
ZJUN +4.3%
Holdings
MMAX 4
ZJUN 4
Avg volume (30D)
MMAX 4.12K sh
ZJUN 38.7K sh, better
NAV per share
MMAX $27.58
ZJUN $27.76
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MMAX: Cost 83, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 50, Durability 62. ZJUN: Cost 21, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings 58, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for MMAX, ZJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMMAXZJUN
Cost30% weightA83HigherF21
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA81HigherD36
Tradability15% weightB64A79Higher
Holdings10% weightC50B58Higher
Durability5% weightB62B64Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Full Protection funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MMAX and ZJUN are both graded against the same 27 S&P 500 Full Protection funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Full Protection⁠

Category · 27 funds
See all 27 ›

MMAX ranks 2nd and ZJUN 21st of 27 funds in the S&P 500 Full Protection Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPSLCalamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AMMAXiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AMAXJiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 19CZFEBInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr FebruaryScore 44
  5. Rank 21CZJUNInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr JuneScore 41
  6. Rank 22CHAUGCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40

MMAX vs ZJUN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MMAX vs ZJUN Cost

Overpaying ZJUN vs MMAX

$4,638

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MMAX 0.53%

    $10,536

  • ZJUN 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MMAX 0.53%
  • ZJUN 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ZJUN $15,174MMAX $10,536

Year by year

YearMMAXZJUNOverpaying
10$953$1,405$452
20$3,658$5,331$1,673
30$10,536$15,174$4,638

Expense ratio

  • 0.53%MMAX, cheaper
  • 0.79%ZJUN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Full Protection funds
  • Median 0.69%

MMAX 6th cheapest of 27 funds

ZJUN 21st cheapest of 27 funds

MMAX vs ZJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
MMAX No data
ZJUN None
Last payment
MMAX $0.35
ZJUN No data
Ex-dividend
MMAX Dec 23, 2025
ZJUN No data
Paid on
MMAX Dec 29, 2025
ZJUN No data
Frequency
MMAX Irregular
ZJUN No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

MMAXIrregular · 1 paymentAll MMAX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
ZJUNAll ZJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MMAX vs ZJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MMAX 1.0%since May 2025ZJUN 1.4%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MMAX 3.21since May 2025ZJUN 0.55since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MMAX −1.9%since Apr 2025ZJUN −1.1%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MMAX 0.08ZJUN 0.11

MMAX and ZJUN in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • MMAXAvsCPSLA

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZJUNCvsCPSLA

    Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsMAXJA

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZJUNCvsMAXJA

    Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsCPSNB

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZJUNCvsCPSNB

    Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June · Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.