UNHG ranks 2nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MXLL vs UNHG
6.7%by weight
UNHG −0.22pt a year
0.99%0.77%
UNHG 19.0×the volume
38.2K726K
MXLL vs UNHG Performance
−52.1%+19.4%
- MXLL 0.99%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- MXLL $3M
- UNHG $63M
- MXLL
- UNHG +11.9%
- MXLL 4
- UNHG 5
- MXLL 38.2K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- MXLL $10.68
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
- —MXLLNot yet graded
| Pillar | MXLL | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | A83 | |
| Tradability | A91 | |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Our read on each fund
MXLL—
UNHGA
In short
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MXLL vs UNHG Holdings
How MXLL and UNHG differ
6.7%
Shared holdings make up 12.0% of UNHG and 6.7% of MXLL.
Level by level
- Holdings6.7%
Sector
No Sector split for MXLL and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in MXLLMore in UNHG | MXLL | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- MXLL206.7%
- UNHG212.0%
- MXLL1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- MXLL
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in MXLL0
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in MXLL
0 securities, 0.0% of MXLL by weight
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in MXLLMore in UNHG | MXLL | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | UNHG +5.27 points | 6.72% | 11.99% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MXLL vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying MXLL vs UNHG
$3,696
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MXLL 0.99%
$18,525
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MXLL | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,371 | $375 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $5,205 | $1,360 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $14,829 | $3,696 |
- 0.99%MXLL
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
MXLL 169th cheapest of 315 funds
MXLL vs UNHG Dividends
- MXLL None
- UNHG
- MXLL
- UNHG $1.90
- MXLL
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- MXLL
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- MXLL
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
MXLL vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MXLL UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MXLL UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- MXLL UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MXLL 0.00UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.