NFRA ranks 4th and OBOR 30th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
NFRA vs OBOR
NFRA −0.32pt a year
0.47%0.79%
NFRA 117.1×the volume
78.3K669
NFRA +5.9pt
+5.6%−0.3%
NFRA vs OBOR Performance
+31.5%−1.4%
- NFRA 0.47%, better
- OBOR 0.79%
- NFRA $3.06B
- OBOR $4M
- NFRA +9.3%, better
- OBOR +3.9%
- NFRA 5.73%, better
- OBOR 1.98%
- NFRA 202
- OBOR 114
- NFRA 78.3K sh, better
- OBOR 669 sh
- NFRA $64.63
- OBOR $26.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NFRA | OBOR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C54 |
| Durability | A81Higher | D31 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. NFRA and OBOR are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NFRAA
OBORD
In short
NFRA Most global infrastructure funds stop at utilities and toll roads. NFRA's index goes wider, adding cell towers, data centers, hospitals, prisons and postal routes to the pipelines and railroads, across developed and emerging markets.
OBOR A one-idea fund: the build-out of China's One Belt One Road. It buys companies worldwide (developed, emerging and frontier) whose revenue rides on China infrastructure, not just Chinese-listed names.
Stated mandate
NFRA The fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index.
OBOR OBOR seeks to track the price and yield performance of an MSCI index designed to identify companies that may benefit from China’s One Belt One Road infrastructure initiative.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NFRA vs OBOR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NFRA vs OBOR Cost
Overpaying OBOR vs NFRA
$5,756
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NFRA 0.47%
$9,418
OBOR 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NFRA | OBOR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,405 | $558 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $5,331 | $2,070 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $15,174 | $5,756 |
- 0.47%NFRA, cheaper
- 0.79%OBOR
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
NFRA 10th cheapest of 33 funds
OBOR 27th cheapest of 33 funds
NFRA vs OBOR Dividends
- NFRA 5.73%, better
- OBOR 1.98%
- NFRA $3.70
- OBOR $0.51
- NFRA $0.33
- OBOR $0.51
- NFRA Sep 18, 2026
- OBOR Dec 22, 2025
- NFRA Sep 24, 2026
- OBOR Dec 23, 2025
- NFRA Quarterly
- OBOR Annual
Distribution history
NFRA vs OBOR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NFRA
- OBOR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NFRA 11.6%, betterOBOR 12.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- NFRA 0.87, betterOBOR 0.68
- Worst fall
- NFRA −22.1%, betterOBOR −34.0%
- Market sensitivity
- NFRA 0.68OBOR 0.70
NFRA and OBOR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


