WTV ranks 1st and NITE 64th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
NITE vs WTV
WTV −1.13pt a year
1.25%0.12%
WTV 82.0×the volume
2.04K167K
NITE vs WTV Performance
+2.7%+20.9%
- NITE 1.25%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- NITE $33M
- WTV $3.33B
- NITE +2.7%
- WTV +20.9%, better
- NITE
- WTV 2.00%
- NITE 20
- WTV 126
- NITE 2.04K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- NITE $37.23
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NITE | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F3 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | D38 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | F22 | A84Higher |
| Durability | D34 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. NITE and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NITEF
WTVA
In short
NITE A former private partnership turned ETF: Nightview runs a non-diversified book of roughly 15 to 25 high-conviction US names and grades itself against the S&P 500 over rolling five-year stretches.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
NITE The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and aims to outperform the S&P 500 Total Return Index over a rolling five-year period. It is actively managed, primarily U.S.-focused, and uses long-term fundamental value investing to identify companies trading below the adviser’s estimated fair value.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NITE vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NITE vs WTV Cost
Overpaying NITE vs WTV
$20,095
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NITE 1.25%
$22,615
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NITE | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,181 | $220 | $1,961 |
| 20 | $8,105 | $859 | $7,246 |
| 30 | $22,615 | $2,520 | $20,095 |
- 1.25%NITE
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
NITE 64th cheapest of 64 funds
NITE vs WTV Dividends
- NITE
- WTV 2.00%
- NITE None
- WTV $2.14
- NITE
- WTV $0.55
- NITE
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- NITE
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- NITE
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
NITE vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NITE 20.7%WTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- NITE 0.71WTV 1.33
- Worst fall
- NITE −29.6%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- NITE 1.29WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 1.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.25% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.