NSIV vs WTV: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

North Square Disciplined Value ETF

NSIVBNYSE Arca

WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

WTVANYSE Arca

Overlap

17.3%by weight

Expense ratio

WTV −0.26pt a year

NSIV0.38%WTV0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

WTV 3.5×the volume

NSIV49.4KWTV173K

NSIV vs WTV Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−1.8%NSIV+0.1%WTV

Expense ratio: NSIV 0.38%; WTV 0.12%, better
Fund size: NSIV $75M; WTV $3.34B
1Y total return: NSIV No data; WTV +20.9%
Yield (12M): NSIV No data; WTV 2.00%
Holdings: NSIV 55; WTV 126
Avg volume (30D): NSIV 49.4K sh; WTV 173K sh, better
NAV per share: NSIV $26.44; WTV $106.94
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for NSIV, WTV, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	NSIV	WTV
Cost30% weight	A75	A100Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	A75Higher	B58
Tradability15% weight	A74	A88Higher
Holdings10% weight	B57	A84Higher
Durability5% weight	F19	A90Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. NSIV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds

See all 64 ›

WTV ranks 1st and NSIV 12th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
Rank 1AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 86
Rank 3ADFLVDimensional US Large Cap Value ETFScore 85
Rank 10BBVALBluemonte Large Cap Value ETFScore 69
Rank 12BNSIVNorth Square Disciplined Value ETFScore 68
Rank 13BVUSVVanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETFScore 67

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NSIVBNorth Square Disciplined Value ETF

WTVAWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

In short

NSIV No data

WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.

Stated mandate

NSIV No data

WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.

Why people hold it

NSIV No data

WTV Charges 0.12% a year, under a quarter of the 0.55% typical for active US value funds, and less than every same-benchmark rival in its group (JAVA 0.44%, CGVV 0.33%, TEQI 0.54%).
"Value" here means cash returned: dividend yield plus net buyback yield, with quality and profitability screens, rather than a plain low price-to-book sort.wisdomtree.com
About 160 US stocks, a multi-billion-dollar asset base, and a live track record dating to 2007. Distributions land quarterly.

Worth knowing

NSIV No data

WTV Full equity with no downside cushion, and a value tilt that can lean into a handful of sectors. Risk is the least polished part of the profile.
Rules-based active, not an index tracker, so results can diverge from the Russell 1000 Value in either direction.
Buybacks supply much of the shareholder yield, and companies can scale repurchases back more easily than they cut dividends.wisdomtree.com

Full NSIV profile⁠

Full WTV profile⁠

NSIV vs WTV Holdings

As of Oct 31, 2026

How NSIV and WTV differ

Overlap by weight

17.3%

Shared holdings make up 34.8% of NSIV and 21.2% of WTV.

Level by level

Holdings18 in both17.3%
Sector11 Sectors92.3%
Countryby domicile95.6%
Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in NSIV and WTV, widest gap first
Sector	Gap	NSIV	WTV
Health Care	NSIV +4.9 points	14.0%	9.1%
Utilities	WTV +2.1 points	2.5%	4.6%
Consumer Staples	WTV +1.7 points	6.7%	8.4%
Financials	WTV +1.5 points	20.3%	21.8%
Real Estate	WTV +1.3 points	2.7%	4.0%
Technology	NSIV +1.1 points	20.5%	19.4%
Energy	NSIV +0.9 points	8.8%	7.9%
Communication	WTV +0.7 points	6.8%	7.5%
Materials	WTV +0.5 points	2.3%	2.8%
Industrials	NSIV +0.4 points	8.8%	8.4%
Consumer Discretionary	NSIV +0.1 points	6.4%	6.3%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in NSIV and WTV, widest gap first
Country	Gap	NSIV	WTV
United Kingdom	NSIV +4.4 points	4.4%	0.0%
United States	WTV +3.9 points	95.6%	99.5%
Sweden	WTV +0.5 points	0.0%	0.5%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

NSIV31.9%
WTV21.1%

Securities held

NSIV55
WTV124

Asset class

NSIV: Stocks
WTV: Stocks

Holdings

Only in NSIV37
In both18
Only in WTV106

Only in NSIV

37 securities, 65.2% of NSIV by weight

Microsoft Corporation4.72%
US Bancorp3.36%
AbbVie, Inc.2.89%
Shell plc2.84%
Bbh Sweep Vehicle2.82%
JPMorgan Chase & Company2.58%
Amazon.com, Inc.2.53%
Apple, Inc.2.44%
General Motors Company2.39%
General Dynamics Corporation2.36%
EOG Resources, Inc.2.18%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.2.06%
Alphabet, Inc.2.01%
Cummins, Inc.2.01%
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.1.98%
Simon Property Group, Inc.1.84%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company1.79%
Elevance Health, Inc.1.62%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1.62%
Dollar General Corporation1.56%
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc1.45%
NXP Semiconductors N.V.1.37%
Nucor Corporation1.35%
Fox Corporation1.31%
MetLife, Inc.1.29%
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (The)1.21%
United Rentals, Inc.1.17%
Avnet, Inc.1.17%
Arrow Electronics, Inc.1.14%
Exelon Corporation1.04%
Tapestry, Inc.0.98%
Intuit, Inc.0.93%
NetApp, Inc.0.89%
VICI Properties, Inc.0.88%
Caterpillar, Inc.0.77%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.0.58%
Receivables/Payables0.06%

Only in WTV

106 securities, 78.7% of WTV by weight

Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.73%
Target Corp1.88%
Merck & Co Inc/NJ1.78%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc1.78%
Newmont Mining Corp1.74%
Cisco Systems Inc1.74%
Southwest Airlines Co1.52%
ConocoPhillips1.33%
Adobe Inc1.28%
Meta PlatformsInc. Cl A1.26%
Ryder System Inc1.25%
UnitedHealth Group Inc1.20%
Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc1.18%
priceline.com Inc1.17%
Morgan Stanley1.13%
NetFlix Inc1.09%
Healthpeak Properties Inc1.07%
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp1.04%
Halliburton Co1.02%
Molson Coors Beverage Co1.01%
Affiliated Managers Group Inc1.00%
Regions Financial Corp0.98%
Rexford Industrial Realty Inc0.98%
Match Group Inc0.96%
Qualcomm Inc0.95%
HCA Healthcare Inc0.88%
Paycom Software Inc0.88%
AT&T Inc0.88%
Kraft Foods Inc0.86%
Phillips 660.85%
Franklin Resources Inc0.83%
Becton Dickinson and Co0.82%
Travelers Cos Inc/The0.80%
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Co0.79%
Maplebear Inc0.79%
Progressive Corp/The0.78%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp0.78%
Cognizant Technology Solutions0.75%
Darden Restaurants Inc0.74%
Kimberly-Clark Corp0.72%
Fortive Corp0.71%
Hewlett-Packard Co0.71%
WP Carey Inc0.71%
Roper Technologies Inc0.70%
Walt Disney Co/The0.70%
GoDaddy Inc - Class A0.69%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities0.68%
Lineage Inc0.67%
Paychex Inc0.67%
Axis Capital Holdings Ltd0.67%

Weight gaps

All 18 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in NSIV and WTV, widest gap first
Holding	Gap	NSIV	WTV
Pfizer, Inc.PFE	NSIV +2.44 points	3.33%	0.89%
Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. (The)HIG	NSIV +2.42 points	2.90%	0.48%
Verizon Communications, Inc.VZ	NSIV +2.40 points	3.52%	1.12%
NVIDIA CorporationNVDA	WTV +2.09 points	1.11%	3.20%
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)GS	NSIV +1.88 points	2.44%	0.56%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.AMP	NSIV +1.73 points	2.33%	0.60%
Synchrony FinancialSYF	NSIV +1.70 points	2.33%	0.63%
Altria Group, Inc.MO	NSIV +1.54 points	2.93%	1.39%
Cigna Group (The)CI	NSIV +1.40 points	2.38%	0.98%
Citigroup, Inc.C	NSIV +1.08 points	2.62%	1.54%
Chevron CorporationCVX	WTV +0.70 points	1.78%	2.48%
Salesforce, Inc.CRM	WTV +0.57 points	1.66%	2.23%
Edison InternationalEIX	NSIV +0.55 points	1.47%	0.92%
Dell Technologies, Inc.DELL	WTV +0.36 points	0.58%	0.94%
Kroger Company (The)KR	WTV +0.16 points	0.63%	0.79%
Micron Technology, Inc.MU	NSIV +0.15 points	0.71%	0.56%
Zoom Communications, Inc.ZM	NSIV +0.15 points	1.16%	1.01%
Valero Energy CorporationVLO	NSIV +0.09 points	0.94%	0.85%

All NSIV holdings⁠All 157 WTV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NSIV vs WTV Cost

Overpaying NSIV vs WTV

$5,186

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

NSIV 0.38%
$7,706
WTV 0.12%
$2,520

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

NSIV 0.38%
WTV 0.12%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	NSIV	WTV	Overpaying
10	$688	$220	$468
20	$2,658	$859	$1,799
30	$7,706	$2,520	$5,186

Expense ratio

0.38%NSIV
0.12%WTV, cheaper

WTV0.12%NSIV0.38%

0.12%1.25%

Middle half of US Active Value funds
Median 0.55%

WTV cheapest of 64 funds

NSIV 16th cheapest of 64 funds

NSIV vs WTV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026

Yield (12M): NSIV No data; WTV 2.00%
Payout (12M): NSIV None; WTV $2.14
Last payment: NSIV No data; WTV $0.55
Ex-dividend: NSIV No data; WTV Sep 25, 2026
Paid on: NSIV No data; WTV Sep 29, 2026
Frequency: NSIV No data; WTV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

NSIVAll NSIV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

WTVQuarterly · 43 paymentsAll WTV payments⁠

NSIV vs WTV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: NSIV No dataWTV 13.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: NSIV No dataWTV 1.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: NSIV No dataWTV −19.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: NSIV 0.04WTV 0.94; Market = 1

NSIV and WTV in the news

All news⁠

ETF Filings
Lone Peak SMID and international value ETFs dated at a 0.70% unitary fee
Sep 10, 2026NSIV

Popular comparisons

NSIVBvsAVLVA
North Square Disciplined Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.38% · 0.15%
Category
WTVAvsAVLVA
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.15%
Category
NSIVBvsDFLVA
North Square Disciplined Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.38% · 0.21%
Category
WTVAvsDFLVA
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.21%
Category
NSIVBvsSEIVA
North Square Disciplined Value ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF
Expense ratio
0.38% · 0.15%
Category
WTVAvsSEIVA
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.15%
Category

NSIV vs WTV

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How NSIV and WTV differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in NSIV

Only in WTV

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Lone Peak SMID and international value ETFs dated at a 0.70% unitary fee