USCL ranks 7th and NUMG 38th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
NUMG vs USCL
USCL −0.23pt a year
0.31%0.08%
NUMG 1.7×the volume
21.7K13.1K
USCL +12.6pt
+7.3%+19.9%
NUMG vs USCL Performance
−6.9%+9.6%
- NUMG 0.31%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- NUMG $296M
- USCL $2.61B
- NUMG −6.9%
- USCL +9.6%, better
- NUMG 0.01%
- USCL 1.06%, better
- NUMG 46
- USCL 393
- NUMG 21.7K sh, better
- USCL 13.1K sh
- NUMG $42.86
- USCL $83.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUMG | USCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A72 | |
| Risk | F3 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | D34 |
| Durability | B62 | A71Higher |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. NUMG and USCL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUMGC
USCLA
In short
NUMG Most mid-cap index funds go wide. NUMG goes narrow: ESG and growth screens distill the middle of the US market down to about 40 names, tracked through an index Nuveen built in-house.
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
NUMG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Nuveen ESG USA Mid-Cap Growth Index. The index targets U.S.-listed mid-cap equities with growth characteristics and ESG criteria.
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUMG vs USCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUMG vs USCL Cost
Overpaying NUMG vs USCL
$4,657
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUMG 0.31%
$6,346
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUMG | USCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $563 | $147 | $416 |
| 20 | $2,182 | $575 | $1,607 |
| 30 | $6,346 | $1,689 | $4,657 |
- 0.31%NUMG
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
NUMG 30th cheapest of 47 funds
NUMG vs USCL Dividends
- NUMG 0.01%
- USCL 1.06%, better
- NUMG $0.0056
- USCL $0.91
- NUMG $0.0056
- USCL $0.20
- NUMG Dec 18, 2025
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- NUMG Dec 19, 2025
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- NUMG Annual
- USCL Quarterly
Distribution history
NUMG vs USCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUMG 18.6%USCL 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NUMG 0.33USCL 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- NUMG −38.7%USCL −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- NUMG 1.26USCL 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.31% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.