Skip to content

NVBT vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF

NVBTCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

NVBT0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 62.7×the volume

NVBT2.2KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

NVBT +3.8pt

NVBT+14.4%ZALT+10.6%

NVBT vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.1%NVBT+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. NVBT +10.1%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NVBT 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
NVBT $29M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
NVBT +10.1%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
NVBT 2
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
NVBT 2.2K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
NVBT $40.99
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NVBT: Cost 68, Risk 49, Mission 82, Tradability 33, Holdings 49, Durability 28. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for NVBT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNVBTZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightA82HigherA80
Risk15% weightC49A79Higher
Tradability15% weightD33B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC49A90Higher
Durability5% weightD28B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NVBT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and NVBT 34th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 34CBMARInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 34CNVBTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 37CBAUGInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NVBTCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

NVBT A one-year hedge that starts its clock on November 1. NVBT absorbs the first 10% of an S&P 500 price decline over each outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap reset every November.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

NVBT The actively managed ETF is designed to provide S&P 500-linked returns over a defined Outcome Period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of index losses.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • NVBT The deal is written down before you take it: the first 10% of S&P 500 price losses in each outcome period are absorbed by the fund's options, with a cap set the same day.
  • At 0.74%, it runs below the median fee for shallow-buffer S&P 500 funds, and matches AllianzIM's own November-, January- and April-start siblings JANT and APRT.
  • AllianzIM runs the calendar, not just one month: twelve-month starts plus six-month Buffer10 pairs like SIXZ, so November is one rung on a ladder rather than a lone bet.
  • Actively managed and self-rolling since its 2022 launch: the options book is rebuilt each November instead of leaving you to reset a collar yourself.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • NVBT The reference is the S&P 500 Price Index, so dividends sit outside the buffer-and-cap math entirely. The fund has paid no distributions.
  • Buffer and cap describe a full outcome period, November 1 to October 31. Buy midstream and your own protection and headroom differ from the headline terms.
  • One of the smaller, more thinly traded funds in a crowded buffer field, so spreads can run wider than at the giants. Limit orders do more work here.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full NVBT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

NVBT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NVBT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying NVBT vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NVBT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NVBT 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530NVBT $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearNVBTZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%NVBT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

NVBT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

NVBT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NVBT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

NVBTAll NVBT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NVBT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NVBT 7.5%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NVBT 1.25ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NVBT −12.9%since Nov 2022ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NVBT 0.65ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • NVBTCvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBTCvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBTCvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.