XHLF ranks 7th and OBIL 32nd of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
OBIL vs XHLF
XHLF −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
XHLF 6.4×the volume
47.5K304K
XHLF +0.1pt
+4.3%+4.4%
OBIL vs XHLF Performance
+3.3%+3.6%
- OBIL 0.15%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- OBIL $337M
- XHLF $2.03B
- OBIL +3.3%
- XHLF +3.6%, better
- OBIL 3.73%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- OBIL 2
- XHLF 29
- OBIL 47.5K sh
- XHLF 304K sh, better
- OBIL $49.91
- XHLF $50.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OBIL | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C40 | C44Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | D35Higher | D32 |
| Durability | C44 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. OBIL and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OBILB
XHLFA
In short
OBIL Most cash-parking ETFs blend a ladder of short bills. OBIL points at one spot on the curve instead: the 12-month Treasury bill. A precision instrument from F/m's benchmark lineup, and it pays monthly.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
OBIL The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of its stated underlying benchmark.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OBIL vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OBIL vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying OBIL vs XHLF
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OBIL 0.15%
$3,137
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OBIL | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%OBIL
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
OBIL 23rd cheapest of 78 funds
OBIL vs XHLF Dividends
- OBIL 3.73%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- OBIL $1.86
- XHLF $1.85
- OBIL $0.18
- XHLF $0.16
- OBIL Oct 27, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- OBIL Oct 28, 2026
- XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- OBIL Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
OBIL vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OBIL 0.7%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- OBIL −0.25, betterXHLF −0.50
- Worst fall
- OBIL −0.3%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- OBIL 0.07XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.