ZALT ranks 1st and OCTZ 56th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
OCTZ vs ZALT
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 55.4×the volume
2.5K138K
OCTZ +6.2pt
+16.8%+10.6%
OCTZ vs ZALT Performance
+8.0%+7.1%
- OCTZ 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- OCTZ $43M
- ZALT $840M
- OCTZ +8.0%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- OCTZ 3.70%
- ZALT
- OCTZ 5
- ZALT 503
- OCTZ 2.5K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- OCTZ $46.55
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OCTZ | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | F24 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A100Higher | A90 |
| Durability | D39 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. OCTZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OCTZC
ZALTA
In short
OCTZ Most buffer ETFs trade away your upside for downside protection. OCTZ skips the hard cap: it targets a 10% cushion against S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month October-to-October period, and leaves the upside open.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
OCTZ The fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while protecting the first 8% to 12% of index losses over a twelve-month period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OCTZ vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OCTZ vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying OCTZ vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OCTZ 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OCTZ | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%OCTZ
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
OCTZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
OCTZ vs ZALT Dividends
- OCTZ 3.70%
- ZALT
- OCTZ $1.70
- ZALT None
- OCTZ $1.70
- ZALT
- OCTZ Dec 24, 2025
- ZALT
- OCTZ Dec 26, 2025
- ZALT
- OCTZ Annual
- ZALT
Distribution history
OCTZ vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OCTZ 9.4%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- OCTZ 1.25ZALT 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- OCTZ −15.8%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- OCTZ 0.71ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.