Skip to content

OCTZ vs ZALT

TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF

OCTZCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

OCTZ0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 55.4×the volume

OCTZ2.5KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

OCTZ +6.2pt

OCTZ+16.8%ZALT+10.6%

OCTZ vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.0%OCTZ+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. OCTZ +8.0%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
OCTZ 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
OCTZ $43M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
OCTZ +8.0%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Yield (12M)
OCTZ 3.70%
ZALT No data
Holdings
OCTZ 5
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
OCTZ 2.5K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
OCTZ $46.55
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

OCTZ: Cost 40, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 100, Durability 39. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for OCTZ, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarOCTZZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightF24A79Higher
Tradability15% weightD27B65Higher
Holdings10% weightA100HigherA90
Durability5% weightD39B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. OCTZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and OCTZ 56th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 55CFJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JuneScore 43
  4. Rank 56COCTZTrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 57CAUGCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

OCTZCTrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

OCTZ Most buffer ETFs trade away your upside for downside protection. OCTZ skips the hard cap: it targets a 10% cushion against S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month October-to-October period, and leaves the upside open.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

OCTZ The fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while protecting the first 8% to 12% of index losses over a twelve-month period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • OCTZ No hard cap. It buffers the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price index losses per period (10% target) while leaving upside open, the design TrueShares built its lineup on.true-shares.com
  • Fixed calendar: each outcome period runs October 1 to September 30, then resets, so the buffer's start and end dates are known up front.true-shares.com
  • October is one of several monthly-dated siblings on the same index (JANZ, MAYZ, NOVZ, DECZ), so the entry month can be picked or laddered across the year.
  • Trading since 2020, one of the longer-running uncapped buffer funds on the S&P 500 price index.true-shares.com
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • OCTZ The buffer is a full-period outcome: buy mid-period and your cushion and starting level differ. Past the buffer, losses follow the index one for one.sec.gov
  • The options reference the S&P 500 price index, so shareholders forgo the index's dividends.sec.gov
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than at the largest buffer funds; 0.79% is the peer median but above laddered options like PSFF (0.10%).
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full OCTZ profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

OCTZ vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

OCTZ vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying OCTZ vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • OCTZ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • OCTZ 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530OCTZ $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearOCTZZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%OCTZ
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

OCTZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

OCTZ vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
OCTZ 3.70%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
OCTZ $1.70
ZALT None
Last payment
OCTZ $1.70
ZALT No data
Ex-dividend
OCTZ Dec 24, 2025
ZALT No data
Paid on
OCTZ Dec 26, 2025
ZALT No data
Frequency
OCTZ Annual
ZALT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

OCTZAnnual · 4 paymentsAll OCTZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.20; Dec 27, 2023 $1.09; Dec 27, 2024 $0.49; Dec 24, 2025 $1.70. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

OCTZ vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
OCTZ 9.4%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
OCTZ 1.25ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
OCTZ −15.8%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
OCTZ 0.71ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • OCTZCvsAUGPB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OCTZCvsTENJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OCTZCvsSIXJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.