UNHG ranks 2nd and OKLC 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
OKLC vs UNHG
0.0%by weight
OKLC −0.32pt a year
0.45%0.77%
UNHG 127.7×the volume
5.69K726K
OKLC vs UNHG Performance
−70.5%−11.0%
- OKLC 0.45%, better
- UNHG 0.77%
- OKLC $0
- UNHG $63M
- OKLC
- UNHG +8.4%
- OKLC 1
- UNHG 5
- OKLC 5.69K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- OKLC $4.57
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OKLC | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | D33 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | F16 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F15 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. OKLC and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OKLCC
UNHGA
In short
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OKLC vs UNHG Holdings
How OKLC and UNHG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of OKLC and 0.0% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for OKLC and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in OKLCMore in UNHG | OKLC | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- OKLC198.7%
- UNHG213.5%
- OKLC0
- UNHG1
Asset class
- OKLC
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in OKLC0
- In both0
- Only in UNHG1
Only in OKLC
0 securities, 0.0% of OKLC by weight
Only in UNHG
1 security, 13.5% of UNHG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204013.47%
Weight gaps
OKLC and UNHG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OKLC vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying UNHG vs OKLC
$5,788
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OKLC 0.45%
$9,041
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OKLC | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,371 | $559 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,205 | $2,077 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,829 | $5,788 |
- 0.45%OKLC, cheaper
- 0.77%UNHG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKLC 7th cheapest of 315 funds
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
OKLC vs UNHG Dividends
- OKLC None
- UNHG
- OKLC
- UNHG $1.90
- OKLC
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- OKLC
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- OKLC
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
OKLC vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OKLC UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- OKLC UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- OKLC UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- OKLC 0.00UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.