OKTG ranks 3rd and RMBC 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
OKTG vs RMBC
0.0%by weight
RMBC −0.30pt a year
0.75%0.45%
OKTG 21.9×the volume
37.8K1.72K
OKTG vs RMBC Performance
+16.9%−45.5%
- OKTG 0.75%
- RMBC 0.45%, better
- OKTG $5M
- RMBC $0
- OKTG 6
- RMBC 1
- OKTG 37.8K sh, better
- RMBC 1.72K sh
- OKTG $34.20
- RMBC $6.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OKTG | RMBC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A78Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C50Higher | F19 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. OKTG and RMBC are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OKTGA
RMBCC
In short
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OKTG vs RMBC Holdings
How OKTG and RMBC differ
0.0%
About this figure: OKTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
RMBC gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for OKTG and RMBC.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for RMBC.
Concentration
- OKTG208.0%
- RMBC199.1%
- OKTG1
- RMBC0
Asset class
- OKTG
- Stocks
- RMBC
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in OKTG1
- In both0
- Only in RMBC0
Only in OKTG
1 security, 8.0% of OKTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.03%
Only in RMBC
0 securities, 0.0% of RMBC by weight
Weight gaps
OKTG and RMBC share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OKTG vs RMBC Cost
Overpaying OKTG vs RMBC
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
RMBC 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OKTG | RMBC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $812 | $524 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,128 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,041 | $5,441 |
- 0.75%OKTG
- 0.45%RMBC, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
RMBC 7th cheapest of 312 funds
OKTG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
OKTG vs RMBC Dividends
- OKTG None
- RMBC None
Distribution history
OKTG vs RMBC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- OKTG 2.39RMBC −5.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.