TSMG ranks 1st and PANG 3rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs TSMG
8.4%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.76%0.76%
TSMG 1.5×the volume
44.6K69K
PANG vs TSMG Performance
+91.6%+40.8%
- PANG 0.76%
- TSMG 0.76%
- PANG $9M
- TSMG $28M
- PANG +91.6%, better
- TSMG +40.8%
- PANG 4
- TSMG 5
- PANG 44.6K sh
- TSMG 69K sh, better
- PANG $31.31
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A94Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A74 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A74 | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
TSMGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs TSMG Holdings
How PANG and TSMG differ
8.4%
Shared holdings make up 12.4% of TSMG and 8.4% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings8.4%
Sector
No Sector split for PANG and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PANGMore in TSMG | PANG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- PANG208.4%
- TSMG212.4%
- PANG1
- TSMG1
Asset class
- PANG
- Equity
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PANG0
- In both1
- Only in TSMG0
Only in PANG
0 securities, 0.0% of PANG by weight
Only in TSMG
0 securities, 0.0% of TSMG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in PANGMore in TSMG | PANG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | TSMG +3.98 points | 8.43% | 12.41% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs TSMG Cost
Same expense ratio
$14,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $1,353 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $5,142 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $14,656 |
- 0.76%PANG
- 0.76%TSMG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs TSMG Dividends
- PANG $1.30
- TSMG $2.73
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- PANG Irregular
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
PANG vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.