SKOR ranks 4th and PFIG 15th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
PFIG vs SKOR
SKOR −0.07pt a year
0.22%0.15%
SKOR 4.1×the volume
36.9K150K
SKOR +0.4pt
+2.4%+2.8%
PFIG vs SKOR Performance
+6.4%+8.8%
- PFIG 0.22%
- SKOR 0.15%, better
- PFIG $129M
- SKOR $1.07B
- PFIG +1.0%
- SKOR +1.1%, better
- PFIG 4.47%
- SKOR 4.77%, better
- PFIG 819
- SKOR 1344
- PFIG 36.9K sh
- SKOR 150K sh, better
- PFIG $23.42
- SKOR $47.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PFIG | SKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A93Higher |
| Risk | B62 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | A77 |
| Durability | B69 | A76Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. PFIG and SKOR are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PFIGB
SKORA
In short
PFIG Most corporate bond funds hand the biggest weight to whoever borrowed the most. PFIG's index sizes issuers by sales, cash flow, dividends and book assets instead, sticking to US public companies in the 1-10 year maturity band.
SKOR Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the market. SKOR scores every eligible bond on issuer quality and relative value, then weights toward the winners, and stays in the one-to-under-10-year maturity lane.
Stated mandate
PFIG The Fund seeks to track the investment results of its specified underlying index before fees and expenses, investing primarily in securities from that index.
SKOR The Fund seeks to provide pre-fee investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust US Corporate Bond Quality Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PFIG vs SKOR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PFIG vs SKOR Cost
Overpaying PFIG vs SKOR
$1,421
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PFIG 0.22%
$4,558
SKOR 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PFIG | SKOR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $1,071 | $490 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $3,137 | $1,421 |
- 0.22%PFIG
- 0.15%SKOR, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SKOR 10th cheapest of 49 funds
PFIG 22nd cheapest of 49 funds
PFIG vs SKOR Dividends
- PFIG 4.47%
- SKOR 4.77%, better
- PFIG $1.05
- SKOR $2.26
- PFIG $0.09
- SKOR $0.20
- PFIG Oct 19, 2026
- SKOR Nov 2, 2026
- PFIG Oct 23, 2026
- SKOR Nov 6, 2026
- PFIG Monthly
- SKOR Monthly
Distribution history
PFIG vs SKOR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PFIG
- SKOR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PFIG 4.2%SKOR 4.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PFIG 0.34SKOR 0.44, better
- Worst fall
- PFIG −14.6%SKOR −14.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PFIG 0.70SKOR 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.