Skip to content

PJUS vs TACU

PGIM Jennison U.S Core Equity ETF

PJUSBCboe

T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF

TACUANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TACU −0.19pt a year

PJUS0.19%TACU0.00%

Avg volume · 30D

TACU 22.9×the volume

PJUS181TACU4.15K

PJUS vs TACU Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

0.0%PJUS+1.2%TACU

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. PJUS 0.0%. TACU +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%3%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PJUS 0.19%
TACU 0.00%, better
Fund size
PJUS $7M
TACU $17M
Holdings
PJUS 98
TACU 411
Avg volume (30D)
PJUS 181 sh
TACU 4.15K sh, better
NAV per share
PJUS $52.59
TACU $27.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PJUS: Cost 92, Risk 70, Mission not scored, Tradability 33, Holdings 67, Durability 23. TACU: Cost 99, Risk 69, Mission 81, Tradability 49, Holdings 83, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for PJUS, TACU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPJUSTACU
Cost30% weightA92A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightA70HigherB69
Tradability15% weightD33C49Higher
Holdings10% weightB67A83Higher
Durability5% weightF23C43Higher

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PJUS and TACU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

TACU ranks 9th and PJUS 31st of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 8AAPUEActivePassive U.S. Equity ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 9ATACUT. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 10APQUSPictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 31BESNEssential 40 Stock ETFScore 67
  5. Rank 31BPJUSPGIM Jennison U.S Core Equity ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 33BCGGRCapital Group Growth ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PJUSBPGIM Jennison U.S Core Equity ETF

TACUAT. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF

In short

PJUS No data

TACU T. Rowe Price's quant-plus-fundamental take on core large-cap U.S. stock, benchmarked to the Russell 1000. Gross fee 0.14%, fully waived to zero through January 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

PJUS No data

TACU The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a primarily U.S. equity portfolio. It combines quantitative models with fundamental, bottom-up analysis and seeks excess returns relative to the Russell 1000 Index.

Why people hold it

PJUS No data

  • TACU Fee fully waived: 0.14% gross, zero net through January 30, 2027. That sits below every top-scoring peer in the category, including DFAU at 0.12% with no waiver.troweprice.com
  • Quant models feed bottom-up stock picking with tilts to profitability, quality and value, chasing excess return over the Russell 1000 while holding tracking error tight.troweprice.com
  • Several hundred large-cap names, so no single position runs the show. One of the stronger profiles in a crowded active U.S. equity field.troweprice.com

Worth knowing

PJUS No data

  • TACU Launched in December 2025, so the live record is short and the risk read rests on limited history.
  • Still a small fund that trades lightly, which can mean wider spreads than the category's giants.
  • Distributions are annual at most, with no declared income target. This is a growth mandate, not a cash-flow one.

Full PJUS profile⁠

Full TACU profile⁠

PJUS vs TACU Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PJUS vs TACU Cost

Overpaying PJUS vs TACU

$3,952

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PJUS 0.19%

    $3,952

  • TACU 0.00%

    $0

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PJUS 0.19%
  • TACU 0.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530PJUS $3,952TACU $0

Year by year

YearPJUSTACUOverpaying
10$347$0$347
20$1,351$0$1,351
30$3,952$0$3,952

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%PJUS
  • 0.00%TACU, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

TACU cheapest of 121 funds

PJUS 11th cheapest of 121 funds

PJUS vs TACU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PJUS None
TACU None

Distribution history

PJUSAll PJUS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TACUAll TACU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PJUS vs TACU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PJUS 0.42TACU 0.96

PJUS and TACU in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PJUSBvsAVLCA

    PGIM Jennison U.S Core Equity ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsAVLCA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJUSBvsDFAUA

    PGIM Jennison U.S Core Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsDFAUA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJUSBvsDFACA

    PGIM Jennison U.S Core Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsDFACA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.