ZAP ranks 1st and POW 10th of 10 funds in the Grid & Electrification Category.
POW vs ZAP
ZAP −0.25pt a year
0.75%0.50%
ZAP 2.6×the volume
47.1K123K
POW vs ZAP Performance
+8.8%+5.6%
- POW 0.75%
- ZAP 0.50%, better
- POW $55M
- ZAP $426M
- POW +8.8%, better
- ZAP +5.6%
- POW
- ZAP 1.87%
- POW 54
- ZAP 50
- POW 47.1K sh
- ZAP 123K sh, better
- POW $20.71
- ZAP $30.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | POW | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | B61Higher |
| Mission | D26 | |
| Risk | D34 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B56 | A76Higher |
Rank among Grid & Electrification funds
Same Category. POW and ZAP are both graded against the same 10 Grid & Electrification funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
POWD
ZAPB
In short
POW Most grid funds buy the utilities. POW works the bill of materials instead: transformers, HVDC gear, switchgear, cooling, the parts list behind the AI power buildout, in an active book of roughly 60 names.
ZAP Most electrification funds buy the picks and shovels. ZAP also buys the power company: a US-focused index spanning conventional generation and delivery, alternative power, and grid hardware, priced at the low end of its peer group.
Stated mandate
POW The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by actively investing in companies involved in electrification infrastructure, including modern energy grids, integrated storage, and distributed power systems.
ZAP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. It invests at least 80% of net assets in securities of that index, including common stocks and ADRs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
POW vs ZAP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
POW vs ZAP Cost
Overpaying POW vs ZAP
$4,503
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
POW 0.75%
$14,482
ZAP 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | POW | ZAP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $900 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,460 | $1,618 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,979 | $4,503 |
- 0.75%POW
- 0.50%ZAP, cheaper
- Middle half of Grid & Electrification funds
- Median 0.53%
ZAP 4th cheapest of 10 funds
POW 8th cheapest of 10 funds
POW vs ZAP Dividends
- POW
- ZAP 1.87%
- POW
- ZAP $0.59
- POW $0.04
- ZAP $0.15
- POW Dec 29, 2025
- ZAP Oct 5, 2026
- POW Dec 30, 2025
- ZAP Oct 8, 2026
- POW Irregular
- ZAP Quarterly
Distribution history
POW vs ZAP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- POW 43.8%ZAP 15.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- POW 0.35ZAP 0.87
- Worst fall
- POW −39.4%ZAP −13.0%
- Market sensitivity
- POW 2.07ZAP 0.55
POW and ZAP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
