USCA ranks 2nd and PRF 8th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
PRF vs USCA
USCA −0.27pt a year
0.34%0.07%
PRF 3.1×the volume
307K97.9K
PRF +2.7pt
+24.0%+21.3%
PRF vs USCA Performance
+24.7%+6.8%
- PRF 0.34%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- PRF $10.1B
- USCA $3.42B
- PRF +24.7%, better
- USCA +6.8%
- PRF 1.32%, better
- USCA 1.06%
- PRF 995
- USCA 392
- PRF 307K sh, better
- USCA 97.9K sh
- PRF $56.12
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PRF | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C43 | A97Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A91Higher |
| Risk | A90Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A75Higher | C49 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. PRF and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PRFB
USCAA
In short
PRF PRF throws out market cap. Since 2005 it has weighted about 1,000 big US companies by book value, cash flow, sales and dividends, so a holding's size reflects its business footprint rather than its share price.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
PRF The Fund seeks to track the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, which selects large US equities using fundamental measures such as book value, cash flow, sales and dividends.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PRF vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PRF vs USCA Cost
Overpaying PRF vs USCA
$5,452
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PRF 0.34%
$6,932
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PRF | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $128 | $488 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $503 | $1,883 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $1,480 | $5,452 |
- 0.34%PRF
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
PRF 17th cheapest of 30 funds
PRF vs USCA Dividends
- PRF 1.32%, better
- USCA 1.06%
- PRF $0.74
- USCA $0.47
- PRF $0.19
- USCA $0.10
- PRF Sep 21, 2026
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- PRF Sep 25, 2026
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- PRF Quarterly
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
PRF vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PRF 11.6%, betterUSCA 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- PRF 1.54, betterUSCA 1.27
- Worst fall
- PRF −19.8%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- PRF 0.89USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.