VIS ranks 3rd and PRN 10th of 10 funds in the Industrials (Broad) Category.
PRN vs VIS
VIS −0.51pt a year
0.60%0.09%
VIS 3.7×the volume
35.3K131K
PRN +2.5pt
+15.3%+12.8%
PRN vs VIS Performance
+63.4%+67.2%
- PRN 0.60%
- VIS 0.09%, better
- PRN $290M
- VIS $8B
- PRN +8.2%
- VIS +10.9%, better
- PRN 0.00%
- VIS 0.94%, better
- PRN 37
- VIS 401
- PRN 35.3K sh
- VIS 131K sh, better
- PRN $184.57
- VIS $312.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PRN | VIS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A72Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F17 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | C54Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | D31 | B58Higher |
| Durability | C40 | A81Higher |
Rank among Industrials (Broad) funds
Same Category. PRN and VIS are both graded against the same 10 Industrials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PRNF
VISB
In short
PRN Most industrials ETFs hold the sector by size. PRN holds its momentum leaders: a few dozen US industrials ranked on relative strength and reshuffled quarterly, at 0.60% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028 (0.69% gross).
VIS Industrials, the whole aisle: jet engines and railroads down to small-cap machinery shops, roughly 400 names for 0.09% a year. Vanguard has run it as a straight index fund since 2004.
Stated mandate
PRN The Fund normally invests at least 90% of its total assets in securities comprising the Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index. That index selects at least 30 Nasdaq US Benchmark Index securities exhibiting relative strength, or momentum.
VIS The fund seeks to track the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index and invests in multicapitalization equities focused on the industrials sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PRN vs VIS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PRN vs VIS Cost
Overpaying PRN vs VIS
$9,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PRN 0.60%
$11,817
VIS 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PRN | VIS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $165 | $911 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $646 | $3,470 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,898 | $9,919 |
- 0.60%PRN
- 0.09%VIS, cheaper
- Middle half of Industrials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.33%
VIS 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
PRN 9th cheapest of 10 funds
PRN vs VIS Dividends
- PRN 0.00%
- VIS 0.94%, better
- PRN None
- VIS $3.06
- PRN
- VIS $0.70
- PRN
- VIS Sep 23, 2026
- PRN
- VIS Sep 25, 2026
- PRN
- VIS Quarterly
Distribution history
PRN vs VIS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PRN
- VIS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PRN 26.8%VIS 16.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PRN 0.85VIS 0.96, better
- Worst fall
- PRN −34.8%VIS −23.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PRN 1.54VIS 1.05
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.