XHLF ranks 5th and PULS 8th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
PULS vs XHLF
XHLF −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
PULS 9.8×the volume
3.03M309K
PULS +0.8pt
+5.2%+4.4%
PULS vs XHLF Performance
+4.1%+3.6%
- PULS 0.15%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- PULS $19.6B
- XHLF $2.03B
- PULS +4.1%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- PULS 4.76%, better
- XHLF 4.08%
- PULS 846
- XHLF 29
- PULS 3.03M sh, better
- XHLF 309K sh
- PULS $49.46
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PULS | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B64Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A78 | A78 |
| Holdings | A80Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A86Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. PULS and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PULSA
XHLFA
In short
PULS The active pick in a cash-parking aisle stocked with index trackers. PGIM's desk hand-selects short investment-grade fixed, floating and variable-rate debt, charges 0.15% a year, and pays monthly.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
PULS Seeks total return from current income and capital appreciation, consistent with preservation of capital. It primarily invests in investment-grade, U.S.-dollar-denominated short-term fixed, variable, and floating-rate debt instruments.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PULS vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PULS vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying PULS vs XHLF
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PULS 0.15%
$3,137
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PULS | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%PULS
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
PULS 23rd cheapest of 78 funds
PULS vs XHLF Dividends
- PULS 4.76%, better
- XHLF 4.08%
- PULS $2.35
- XHLF $2.05
- PULS $0.18
- XHLF $0.16
- PULS Oct 30, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- PULS Pays Nov 3, 2026
- XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- PULS Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
PULS vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PULS 0.4%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PULS 2.06, betterXHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- PULS −0.8%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- PULS 0.03XHLF 0.03Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
PULS and XHLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
