VTV ranks 2nd and PWV 30th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
PWV vs VTV
VTV −0.52pt a year
0.55%0.03%
VTV 18.7×the volume
151K2.83M
VTV +0.4pt
+12.6%+13.0%
PWV vs VTV Performance
+91.4%+79.8%
- PWV 0.55%
- VTV 0.03%, better
- PWV $1.89B
- VTV $252B
- PWV +27.2%, better
- VTV +25.3%
- PWV 1.70%
- VTV 1.83%, better
- PWV 51
- VTV 300
- PWV 151K sh
- VTV 2.83M sh, better
- PWV $80.86
- VTV $228.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PWV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B63 | A89Higher |
| Risk | A81 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | C51Higher |
| Durability | B63 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. PWV and VTV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PWVC
VTVA
In short
PWV A 2005-vintage value fund that doesn't just buy the cheap half of the market. Invesco's Intellidex rules screen large caps down to roughly 50 names, and you pay 0.55% a year for that selectivity.
VTV Value investing for three cents on every hundred dollars a year. Since 2004, VTV has run a passive, fully invested portfolio of roughly 300 large US companies that screen cheap, at a fee near the industry floor.
Stated mandate
PWV The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks that comprise its underlying index.
VTV The fund seeks to track a large-capitalization U.S. value-stock benchmark through passive indexing and substantial replication of that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PWV vs VTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PWV vs VTV Cost
Overpaying PWV vs VTV
$10,266
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PWV 0.55%
$10,904
VTV 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PWV | VTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $55 | $933 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $216 | $3,574 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $638 | $10,266 |
- 0.55%PWV
- 0.03%VTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
VTV cheapest of 40 funds
PWV 35th cheapest of 40 funds
PWV vs VTV Dividends
- PWV 1.70%
- VTV 1.83%, better
- PWV $1.37
- VTV $4.16
- PWV $0.34
- VTV $1.02
- PWV Sep 21, 2026
- VTV Sep 28, 2026
- PWV Sep 25, 2026
- VTV Sep 30, 2026
- PWV Quarterly
- VTV Quarterly
Distribution history
PWV vs VTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PWV
- VTV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PWV 12.6%VTV 11.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PWV 1.44VTV 1.44Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- PWV −16.4%, betterVTV −17.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PWV 0.65VTV 0.69
PWV and VTV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





