PYZ ranks 10th and TRUF 23rd of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.
PYZ vs TRUF
TRUF −0.50pt a year
0.60%0.10%
PYZ 5.0×the volume
1.85K374
PYZ vs TRUF Performance
−5.0%−0.4%
- PYZ 0.60%
- TRUF 0.10%, better
- PYZ $63M
- TRUF $1M
- PYZ +7.7%
- TRUF
- PYZ 0.51%
- TRUF
- PYZ 43
- TRUF 79
- PYZ 1.85K sh, better
- TRUF 374 sh
- PYZ $112.31
- TRUF $29.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PYZ | TRUF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56 | A99Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D26 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A75Higher | F17 |
Rank among US Active Sector funds
Same Category. PYZ and TRUF are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PYZB
TRUFC
In short
PYZ Materials, ranked by momentum. PYZ scores US basic-materials stocks on relative strength, holds at least 30 of the strongest, and weights them by momentum score rather than market cap. Reshuffled quarterly since 2006.
TRUF Most active funds exist to beat a benchmark. TRUF is active so it can hug one: it holds US financials at true market weight, sidestepping the diversification caps that force many sector funds to shrink their largest names.
Stated mandate
PYZ The fund normally invests at least 90% of its total assets in securities comprising its index. The index selects at least 30 Nasdaq US securities showing relative strength, or momentum.
TRUF The Fund is an actively managed ETF seeking long-term capital appreciation through securities of financials-related companies or instruments providing exposure to such companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PYZ vs TRUF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PYZ vs TRUF Cost
Overpaying PYZ vs TRUF
$9,711
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PYZ 0.60%
$11,817
TRUF 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PYZ | TRUF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $183 | $893 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $717 | $3,399 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $2,106 | $9,711 |
- 0.60%PYZ
- 0.10%TRUF, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Sector funds
- Median 0.61%
TRUF cheapest of 35 funds
PYZ 15th cheapest of 35 funds
PYZ vs TRUF Dividends
- PYZ 0.51%
- TRUF
- PYZ $0.57
- TRUF
- PYZ $0.15
- TRUF $0.10
- PYZ Sep 21, 2026
- TRUF Oct 1, 2026
- PYZ Sep 25, 2026
- TRUF Oct 6, 2026
- PYZ Quarterly
- TRUF Quarterly
Distribution history
PYZ vs TRUF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PYZ 20.5%TRUF
- Return per unit of risk
- PYZ 0.61TRUF
- Worst fall
- PYZ −33.0%TRUF
- Market sensitivity
- PYZ 1.28TRUF −1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.