Skip to content
etf.net

QBKV vs RB

Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

QBKVBCboe

ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF

RBCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

RB −0.16pt a year

QBKV0.74%RB0.58%

Avg volume · 30D

QBKV 6.8×the volume

QBKV2.56KRB377

QBKV vs RB Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.8%QBKV+0.4%RB

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QBKV −0.8%. RB +0.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−3%−2%2%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QBKV 0.74%
RB 0.58%, better
Fund size
QBKV $7M
RB $1M
1Y total return
QBKV No data
RB +12.7%
Yield (12M)
QBKV No data
RB 2.31%
Holdings
QBKV 3
RB 1952
Avg volume (30D)
QBKV 2.56K sh, better
RB 377 sh
NAV per share
QBKV $27.23
RB $46.63
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QBKV: Cost 73, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 53, Durability 25. RB: Cost 80, Risk 89, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 80, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for QBKV, RB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQBKVRB
Cost30% weightA73A80Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49A89Higher
Tradability15% weightC50HigherC41
Holdings10% weightC53A80Higher
Durability5% weightD25D33Higher

Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QBKV and RB are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Russell 2000 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

QBKV ranks 2nd and RB 7th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBKFAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BQBKVAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 3BKOCTInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 5CKJULInnovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 49
  5. Rank 7CRBProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 7CSCAUCorgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40

QBKV vs RB Holdings

How QBKV and RB differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QBKV and 0.0% of RB.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors99.6%

Sector

Sector weights in QBKV and RB, widest gap first
SectorMore in QBKVMore in RB
IndustrialsQBKV +0.2 points
TechnologyRB +0.1 points
FinancialsQBKV +0.2 points
Health CareRB +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
EnergyRB +0.1 points
Consumer StaplesSame weight
CommunicationRB +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QBKV and RB, widest gap first
CountryMore in QBKVMore in RB
United StatesSame weight
BrazilSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
CanadaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
TaiwanSame weight
NorwayQBKV +0.1 points
SingaporeSame weight
Other countries (5)Same weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QBKV101.9%
  • RB15.1%

Securities held

  • QBKV2
  • RB1,951

Asset class

QBKV
Equity
RB
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in QBKV2
  • In both0
  • Only in RB1,951

Only in QBKV

2 securities, 100% of QBKV by weight

  • Iwm 12/31/2026 2.06 C99.28%
  • Iwm 12/31/2026 277.92 P2.04%

Only in RB

1,951 securities, 87.7% of RB by weight

  • Glaukos Corp0.39%
  • Brightspring Health Services0.33%
  • Jfrog Ltd0.32%

Weight gaps

QBKV and RB share no securities.

All 5 QBKV holdings⁠All RB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QBKV vs RB Cost

Overpaying QBKV vs RB

$2,854

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QBKV 0.74%

    $14,307

  • RB 0.58%

    $11,453

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QBKV 0.74%
  • RB 0.58%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530QBKV $14,307RB $11,453

Year by year

YearQBKVRBOverpaying
10$1,319$1,041$278
20$5,015$3,986$1,029
30$14,307$11,453$2,854

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%QBKV
  • 0.58%RB, cheaper
  • Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.77%

RB 5th cheapest of 14 funds

QBKV 6th cheapest of 14 funds

QBKV vs RB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QBKV No data
RB 2.31%
Payout (12M)
QBKV None
RB $1.08
Last payment
QBKV No data
RB $0.15
Ex-dividend
QBKV No data
RB Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
QBKV No data
RB Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
QBKV No data
RB Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

QBKVAll QBKV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RBQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll RB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 24, 2025 $0.13; Dec 24, 2025 $0.64; Mar 25, 2026 $0.15; Jun 24, 2026 $0.14; Sep 23, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

QBKV vs RB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QBKV No dataRB 3.5%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QBKV No dataRB 2.68since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QBKV No dataRB −2.4%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QBKV 0.31RB 0.08

Popular comparisons

  • QBKVBvsQBKFB

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RBCvsQBKFB

    ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBKVBvsKOCTB

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RBCvsKOCTB

    ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBKVBvsKAPRC

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RBCvsKAPRC

    ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.