Skip to content
etf.net

QBKV vs SCAU

Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

QBKVBCboe

Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

SCAUCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SCAU −0.44pt a year

QBKV0.74%SCAU0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

SCAU 1.6×the volume

QBKV2.56KSCAU4.21K

QBKV vs SCAU Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.3%QBKV+0.4%SCAU

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QBKV +0.3%. SCAU +0.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1.5%−1%−0.5%1%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
QBKV 0.74%
SCAU 0.30%, better
Fund size
QBKV $7M
SCAU $1M
Holdings
QBKV 3
SCAU 4
Avg volume (30D)
QBKV 2.56K sh
SCAU 4.21K sh, better
NAV per share
QBKV $27.23
SCAU $24.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QBKV: Cost 73, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 53, Durability 25. SCAU: Cost 93, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 6.
Pillar letters and Scores for QBKV, SCAU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQBKVSCAU
Cost30% weightA73A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49HigherD27
Tradability15% weightC50HigherC46
Holdings10% weightC53Not scored
Durability5% weightD25HigherF6

Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QBKV and SCAU are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Russell 2000 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

QBKV ranks 2nd and SCAU 7th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBKFAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BQBKVAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 3BKOCTInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 7CRBProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 7CSCAUCorgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 7CSCJLCorgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40

QBKV vs SCAU Holdings

How QBKV and SCAU differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QBKV and 0.0% of SCAU.

Level by level

  • Asset classEquity, Alternatives0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for SCAU.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QBKV and SCAU, widest gap first
CountryMore in QBKVMore in SCAU
United StatesSame weight
BrazilSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
CanadaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
TaiwanSame weight
NorwaySame weight
SingaporeSame weight
Other countries (5)Same weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QBKV101.9%
  • SCAU103.7%

Securities held

  • QBKV2
  • SCAU3

Asset class

QBKV
Equity
SCAU
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in QBKV2
  • In both0
  • Only in SCAU3

Only in QBKV

2 securities, 100% of QBKV by weight

  • Iwm 12/31/2026 2.06 C99.28%
  • Iwm 12/31/2026 277.92 P2.04%

Only in SCAU

3 securities, 100% of SCAU by weight

  • Iwm 07/30/2027 59.24 C75.47%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202718.79%
  • Iwm 07/30/2027 296.22 P8.39%

Weight gaps

QBKV and SCAU share no securities.

All 5 QBKV holdings⁠All SCAU holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QBKV vs SCAU Cost

Overpaying QBKV vs SCAU

$8,158

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QBKV 0.74%

    $14,307

  • SCAU 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QBKV 0.74%
  • SCAU 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530QBKV $14,307SCAU $6,149

Year by year

YearQBKVSCAUOverpaying
10$1,319$545$774
20$5,015$2,113$2,902
30$14,307$6,149$8,158

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%QBKV
  • 0.30%SCAU, cheaper
  • Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.77%

SCAU cheapest of 14 funds

QBKV 6th cheapest of 14 funds

QBKV vs SCAU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
QBKV None
SCAU None

Distribution history

QBKVAll QBKV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SCAUAll SCAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBKV vs SCAU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QBKV 0.31SCAU 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • QBKVBvsQBKFB

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SCAUCvsQBKFB

    Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBKVBvsKOCTB

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SCAUCvsKOCTB

    Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBKVBvsKAPRC

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SCAUCvsKAPRC

    Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.