USCA ranks 2nd and QFHD 26th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
QFHD vs USCA
USCA −0.42pt a year
0.49%0.07%
USCA 215.7×the volume
45497.9K
QFHD vs USCA Performance
+6.4%+1.8%
- QFHD 0.49%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- QFHD $1M
- USCA $3.42B
- QFHD
- USCA +7.7%
- QFHD
- USCA 1.05%
- QFHD 102
- USCA 392
- QFHD 454 sh
- USCA 97.9K sh, better
- QFHD $28.72
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QFHD | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A97Higher |
| Mission | F0 | A91Higher |
| Risk | A84Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | F21 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D29 |
| Durability | F5 | C49Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. QFHD and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QFHDD
USCAA
In short
QFHD Plenty of funds chase the S&P 500's fattest dividends. QFHD adds a gate: the payout has to sit on above-average free cash flow. Pacer's cash-flow discipline, pointed at roughly 100 large-cap yielders.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
QFHD The fund uses a rules-based screen within the S&P 500 universe to select companies combining high trailing dividend yield with above-average free-cash-flow quality.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QFHD vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QFHD vs USCA Cost
Overpaying QFHD vs USCA
$8,312
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QFHD 0.49%
$9,792
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QFHD | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $128 | $755 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $503 | $2,891 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $1,480 | $8,312 |
- 0.49%QFHD
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
QFHD 24th cheapest of 30 funds
QFHD vs USCA Dividends
- QFHD
- USCA 1.05%
- QFHD
- USCA $0.47
- QFHD $0.19
- USCA $0.10
- QFHD Sep 3, 2026
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- QFHD Sep 8, 2026
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- QFHD Quarterly
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
QFHD vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QFHD USCA 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- QFHD USCA 1.27
- Worst fall
- QFHD USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- QFHD 0.06USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.