SPBO ranks 2nd and QLTA 4th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
QLTA vs SPBO
SPBO −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
SPBO 2.2×the volume
271K591K
SPBO +0.6pt
+1.8%+2.4%
QLTA vs SPBO Performance
−2.2%+0.3%
- QLTA 0.15%
- SPBO 0.03%, better
- QLTA $1.19B
- SPBO $2.14B
- QLTA −0.9%
- SPBO −0.4%, better
- QLTA 4.68%
- SPBO 5.28%, better
- QLTA 3539
- SPBO 4468
- QLTA 271K sh
- SPBO 591K sh, better
- QLTA $45.88
- SPBO $27.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLTA | SPBO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C41 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A83 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | A82 |
| Durability | A83 | A90Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. QLTA and SPBO are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLTAA
SPBOA
In short
QLTA "Investment grade" spans a lot of ground, and its bottom rung sits one downgrade from junk. QLTA cuts that rung out and holds only Aaa through A corporate bonds: the credit-quality purist of the corporate bond aisle, running since 2012.
SPBO The whole investment-grade corporate bond market in one ticker for three basis points. Most rivals sell you a maturity slice; SPBO owns the lot, and it undercuts other funds tracking the very same Bloomberg index.
Stated mandate
QLTA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar investment-grade corporate bonds rated Aaa through A.
SPBO The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLTA vs SPBO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLTA vs SPBO Cost
Overpaying QLTA vs SPBO
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLTA 0.15%
$3,137
SPBO 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLTA | SPBO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%QLTA
- 0.03%SPBO, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SPBO cheapest of 49 funds
QLTA 10th cheapest of 49 funds
QLTA vs SPBO Dividends
- QLTA 4.68%
- SPBO 5.28%, better
- QLTA $2.15
- SPBO $1.48
- QLTA $0.18
- SPBO $0.12
- QLTA Oct 1, 2026
- SPBO Oct 1, 2026
- QLTA Oct 6, 2026
- SPBO Oct 6, 2026
- QLTA Monthly
- SPBO Monthly
Distribution history
QLTA vs SPBO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLTA
- SPBO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLTA 6.3%, betterSPBO 6.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLTA 0.21SPBO 0.34, better
- Worst fall
- QLTA −21.0%, betterSPBO −21.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QLTA 1.10SPBO 1.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.