UNHG ranks 1st and QSU 284th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
QSU vs UNHG
UNHG −0.55pt a year
1.32%0.77%
UNHG 7.8×the volume
95.8K744K
QSU vs UNHG Performance
−96.9%+18.8%
- QSU 1.32%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- QSU $5M
- UNHG $73M
- QSU −96.9%
- UNHG +18.8%, better
- QSU 9
- UNHG 6
- QSU 95.8K sh
- UNHG 744K sh, better
- QSU $3.13
- UNHG $19.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QSU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | B61Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A91Higher |
| Risk | F20 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. QSU and UNHG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QSUD
UNHGA
In short
QSU The first 2x ETF on QuantumScape. QSU aims to deliver 200% of QS's daily move, resets every session, and charges 1.32% a year with no fee waiver.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
QSU The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily percentage change in QuantumScape Corporation's share price. It is designed for a single trading day rather than longer holding periods.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QSU vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QSU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying QSU vs UNHG
$8,839
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QSU 1.32%
$23,668
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QSU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,296 | $1,371 | $925 |
| 20 | $8,507 | $5,205 | $3,302 |
| 30 | $23,668 | $14,829 | $8,839 |
- 1.32%QSU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
QSU 243rd cheapest of 312 funds
QSU vs UNHG Dividends
- QSU None
- UNHG
- QSU
- UNHG $1.90
- QSU
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- QSU
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- QSU
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
QSU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QSU 108.1%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- QSU −2.55UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- QSU −98.2%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- QSU 5.66UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 1.32% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.