UNHG ranks 2nd and RBLU 249th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
RBLU vs UNHG
UNHG −0.28pt a year
1.05%0.77%
UNHG 1.6×the volume
443K726K
RBLU vs UNHG Performance
−93.6%+8.4%
- RBLU 1.05%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- RBLU $7M
- UNHG $63M
- RBLU −93.6%
- UNHG +8.4%, better
- RBLU 3
- UNHG 5
- RBLU 443K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- RBLU $3.95
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RBLU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | D27 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B65 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. RBLU and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RBLUD
UNHGA
In short
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RBLU vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RBLU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying RBLU vs UNHG
$4,666
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RBLU 1.05%
$19,495
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RBLU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,371 | $476 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $5,205 | $1,722 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $14,829 | $4,666 |
- 1.05%RBLU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
RBLU 201st cheapest of 315 funds
RBLU vs UNHG Dividends
- RBLU $0.38
- UNHG $1.90
- RBLU Dec 24, 2025
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- RBLU Dec 26, 2025
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- RBLU Irregular
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
RBLU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RBLU 129.4%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- RBLU −0.17UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- RBLU −97.0%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- RBLU 3.23UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.