Skip to content

REVS vs SCHV

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF

REVSBNYSE Arca

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

SCHVANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHV −0.16pt a year

REVS0.20%SCHV0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHV 70.6×the volume

REVS45.2KSCHV3.19M

5Y return · a year

REVS +2.6pt

REVS+12.6%SCHV+10.0%

REVS vs SCHV Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+80.8%REVS+61.1%SCHV

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. REVS +80.8%. SCHV +61.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
REVS 0.20%
SCHV 0.04%, better
Fund size
REVS $399M
SCHV $15.4B
1Y total return
REVS +27.5%, better
SCHV +22.1%
Yield (12M)
REVS 1.73%
SCHV 1.81%, better
Holdings
REVS 304
SCHV 567
Avg volume (30D)
REVS 45.2K sh
SCHV 3.19M sh, better
NAV per share
REVS $34.04
SCHV $33.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

REVS: Cost 51, Risk 81, Mission 90, Tradability 31, Holdings 37, Durability 30. SCHV: Cost 96, Risk 70, Mission 89, Tradability 95, Holdings 59, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for REVS, SCHV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarREVSSCHV
Cost30% weightC51A96Higher
Mission25% weightA90HigherA89
Risk15% weightA81HigherA70
Tradability15% weightD31A95Higher
Holdings10% weightD37B59Higher
Durability5% weightD30B68Higher

Rank among US Value Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. REVS and SCHV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Value Index⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

SCHV ranks 1st and REVS 18th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AVTVVanguard Morningstar Value ETFScore 82
  3. Rank 18BPYPrincipal Value ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 18BREVSColumbia Research Enhanced Value ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 18BSTXVStrive 1000 Value ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

REVSBColumbia Research Enhanced Value ETF

SCHVASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

In short

REVS REVS is the Russell 1000 Value with the low-rated names cut: Columbia's quant models grade every stock, roughly a third survive, sector weights still match the parent. 0.19% net of a waiver through February 28, 2027.

SCHV No data

Stated mandate

REVS The Fund seeks, before fees and expenses, to closely track the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index.

SCHV No data

Why people hold it

  • REVS Improvement by subtraction: the index takes the Russell 1000 Value, keeps the names Columbia's models rate a buy on quality, value and catalyst factors, and cap-weights them.columbiathreadneedleus.comsec.gov
  • Sector weights are matched to the Russell 1000 Value, so the bet is stock selection, not a hidden overweight to banks or energy.columbiathreadneedleus.com
  • Quant research at near-index cost: 0.19% net of a waiver through February 28, 2027 (0.20% gross), near the category median for US value funds.
  • Full replication of a roughly 300-stock basket, and it has tracked that index closely since its 2019 launch.quantumonline.com

SCHV No data

Worth knowing

  • REVS Plain-vanilla value costs far less: VTV charges 0.03% and SCHV 0.04% for cap-weighted value with no research overlay on top.
  • Thinner trading than the category giants, so spreads can run wider, especially on large or hurried orders.
  • Methodology quirks worth knowing: every biotech name in the universe is included regardless of its rating, and the fund does not take defensive positions in selloffs.columbiathreadneedleus.comstreetinsider.com

SCHV No data

Full REVS profile⁠

Full SCHV profile⁠

REVS vs SCHV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

REVS vs SCHV Cost

Overpaying REVS vs SCHV

$3,306

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • REVS 0.20%

    $4,155

  • SCHV 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • REVS 0.20%
  • SCHV 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K$5K051015202530REVS $4,155SCHV $849

Year by year

YearREVSSCHVOverpaying
10$365$73$292
20$1,421$288$1,133
30$4,155$849$3,306

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%REVS
  • 0.04%SCHV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Value Index funds
  • Median 0.20%

SCHV 3rd cheapest of 40 funds

REVS 19th cheapest of 40 funds

REVS vs SCHV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
REVS 1.73%
SCHV 1.81%, better
Payout (12M)
REVS $0.60
SCHV $0.63
Last payment
REVS $0.60
SCHV $0.16
Ex-dividend
REVS Dec 18, 2025
SCHV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
REVS Dec 26, 2025
SCHV Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
REVS Annual
SCHV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

REVSAnnual · 7 paymentsAll REVS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2019 $0.15; Dec 18, 2020 $4.67; Dec 20, 2021 $0.25; Dec 19, 2022 $0.48; Dec 18, 2023 $0.54; Dec 18, 2024 $0.47; Dec 18, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
SCHVQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll SCHV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.10; Jun 19, 2017 $0.10; Sep 18, 2017 $0.11; Dec 18, 2017 $0.12; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 26, 2018 $0.12; Sep 25, 2018 $0.13; Dec 12, 2018 $0.14; Mar 20, 2019 $0.13; Jun 26, 2019 $0.13; Sep 25, 2019 $0.14; Dec 12, 2019 $0.21; Mar 25, 2020 $0.14; Jun 24, 2020 $0.12; Sep 23, 2020 $0.22; Dec 10, 2020 $0.13; Mar 24, 2021 $0.10; Jun 23, 2021 $0.12; Sep 22, 2021 $0.12; Dec 8, 2021 $0.14; Dec 30, 2021 $0.0023; Mar 23, 2022 $0.11; Jun 22, 2022 $0.13; Sep 21, 2022 $0.13; Dec 7, 2022 $0.15; Mar 22, 2023 $0.13; Jun 21, 2023 $0.13; Sep 20, 2023 $0.14; Dec 6, 2023 $0.16; Mar 20, 2024 $0.13; Jun 26, 2024 $0.15; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 11, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.14; Jun 25, 2025 $0.15; Sep 24, 2025 $0.15; Dec 10, 2025 $0.17; Mar 25, 2026 $0.14; Jun 24, 2026 $0.16; Sep 23, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

REVS vs SCHV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • REVS
  • SCHV
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: REVS −18.1% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
REVS 11.9%SCHV 11.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
REVS 1.46, betterSCHV 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
REVS −18.1%, betterSCHV −19.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
REVS 0.77SCHV 0.83

REVS and SCHV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • REVSBvsVTVA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsVTVA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REVSBvsIUSVA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsIUSVA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REVSBvsIWDA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsIWDA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.