XLV ranks 1st and RSPH 7th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
RSPH vs XLV
XLV −0.32pt a year
0.40%0.08%
XLV 54.2×the volume
168K9.1M
XLV +1.1pt
+11.5%+12.6%
RSPH vs XLV Performance
+33.8%+48.8%
- RSPH 0.40%
- XLV 0.08%, better
- RSPH $980M
- XLV $48.5B
- RSPH +32.8%, better
- XLV +30.1%
- RSPH 0.56%
- XLV 1.38%, better
- RSPH 62
- XLV 64
- RSPH 168K sh
- XLV 9.1M sh, better
- RSPH $39.69
- XLV $184.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSPH | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A84Higher |
| Risk | A77 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | B65 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A91Higher | D39 |
| Durability | B68 | A87Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. RSPH and XLV are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSPHB
XLVA
In short
RSPH Health care without the mega-cap gravity: RSPH gives every health care name in the S&P 500 the same slice, so no single drug giant steers the fund. It has been running that way since 2006.
XLV Live since 1998, XLV is the original way to own health care: about 60 S&P 500 names, a 0.08% fee, and one of the busiest tickers in the sector. Big pharma and device makers, not small-cap biotech.
Stated mandate
RSPH The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care Index.
XLV The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Health Care Select Sector Index, which represents the health care sector of the S&P 500 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSPH vs XLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSPH vs XLV Cost
Overpaying RSPH vs XLV
$6,401
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSPH 0.40%
$8,090
XLV 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSPH | XLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $147 | $576 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $575 | $2,218 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,689 | $6,401 |
- 0.40%RSPH
- 0.08%XLV, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
XLV cheapest of 25 funds
RSPH 11th cheapest of 25 funds
RSPH vs XLV Dividends
- RSPH 0.56%
- XLV 1.38%, better
- RSPH $0.22
- XLV $2.55
- RSPH $0.05
- XLV $0.64
- RSPH Sep 21, 2026
- XLV Sep 21, 2026
- RSPH Sep 25, 2026
- XLV Sep 23, 2026
- RSPH Quarterly
- XLV Quarterly
Distribution history
RSPH vs XLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RSPH
- XLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSPH 15.4%XLV 14.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RSPH 0.79, betterXLV 0.78
- Worst fall
- RSPH −21.9%XLV −17.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RSPH 0.78XLV 0.56
RSPH and XLV in the news
Category Review
Health care funds trail the S&P 500 this year






Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.